Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pharmacological Treatments: a Scoping Review
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting approximately 0.5–1.0% of the adult population and is a significant contributor of disability worldwide. While Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain the gold standard for evaluating pharmacological treatments, they often fail to capture outcomes that reflect patients’ lived experiences, also referred to as functioning. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Brief Core Set for RA offers a standardized, patient-centered framework for assessing functioning across relevant domains. Objective: To examine the extent to which functioning-related outcomes in Phase III pharmacological RCTs for RA align with the ICF Brief Core Set for RA and to identify the most frequently represented functioning categories. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Literature was searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2010 to 2025. Phase III RCTs evaluating pharmacological interventions in adult patients with RA were included. Functioning-related outcomes were extracted and mapped to ICF categories using standardized linking rules. Results: Of 852 records screened, 91 met the inclusion criteria. Functioning was frequently assessed through patient-reported outcomes and composite clinical measures. The most commonly linked ICF categories included sensation of pain (b280) and mobility of joint functions (b710) from the body functions domain; walking (d450) and carrying out daily routine (d230) from the activities and participation domain; and structures of the shoulder (s720), upper (s730), and lower extremities (s740) from the body structures domain. However, none of the studies explicitly used the ICF framework. Conclusion: Functioning is implicitly assessed in RA pharmacological trials, yet the ICF framework remains underutilized. Explicit integration of the ICF Brief Core Set for RA into trial design could improve the standardization, comparability, and patient-centeredness of outcome measurement, ensuring that clinical research better reflects what matters most to individuals living with RA.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatoid arthritis, 1990–2020, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021The Lancet Rheumatology, 2023
- Linking ICF components to outcome measures for hand osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic reviewJournal of Hand Therapy, 2020
- Bridging the Gap Between RCTs and RWE Through Endpoint SelectionTherapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2020
- Economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of literature in biologic eraAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2020
- Factors Associated With Hand and Upper Arm Functional Disability in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic ReviewArthritis Care & Research, 2019
- Patient Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical TrialsCurrent Rheumatology Reports, 2015
- The ReplyThe American Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Systematic review of measures and their concepts used in published studies focusing on the treatment of acute inflammatory arthritisClinical Rheumatology, 2006
- Validating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Comprehensive Core Set for Rheumatoid Arthritis from the patient perspective: A qualitative studyArthritis & Rheumatism, 2005
- ICF Core Sets for rheumatoid arthritisJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2004