Artificial scholarship: LLMs in health professions education research
Open Access
- 19 June 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Health Sciences Education
- Vol. 28 (3) , 659-664
Abstract
This editorial examines the implications of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, on the authorship and authority of academic papers, and the potential ethical concerns and challenges in health professions education (HPE).Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial Intelligence Tools in Scholarly Publishing: Guidance for Academic Medicine AuthorsAcademic Medicine, 2023
- Who should be an author on this paper?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2023
- ChatGPT’s inconsistent moral advice influences users’ judgmentScientific Reports, 2023
- ChatGPT: not all languages are equalNature, 2023
- ChatGPT: five priorities for researchNature, 2023
- Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their useNature, 2023
- The need for health AI ethics in medical school educationAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2021
- The role of data science and machine learning in Health Professions Education: practical applications, theoretical contributions, and epistemic beliefsAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2020
- Why We Needn’t Fear the Machines: Opportunities for Medicine in a Machine Learning WorldAcademic Medicine, 2019
- ComputerphobiaBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 1987