Health Care System Planning for and Response to a Nuclear Detonation
Authors:
- John L. HickJHJohn L. Hick
- David M. WeinstockDWDavid M. Weinstock
- C. Norman ColemanCCC. Norman Coleman
- Dan HanflingDHDan Hanfling
- Stephen CantrillSCStephen Cantrill
- Irwin RedlenerIRIrwin Redlener
- Judith L. BaderJBJudith L. Bader
- Paula Murrain-HillPMPaula Murrain-Hill
- Ann R. KnebelAKAnn R. Knebel
Open Access
- 1 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
- Vol. 5 (S1) , S73-S88
Abstract
The hallmark of a successful response to a nuclear detonation will be the resilience of the community, region, and nation. An incident of this magnitude will rapidly become a national incident; however, the initial critical steps to reduce lives lost, save the lives that can be saved with the resources available, and understand and apply resources available to a complex and dynamic situation will be the responsibility of the local and regional responders and planners. Expectations of the public health and health care systems will be met to the extent possible by coordination, cooperation, and an effort to produce as consistent a response as possible for the victims. Responders will face extraordinarily stressful situations, and their own physical and psychological health is of great importance to optimizing the response. This article illustrates through vignettes and supporting text how the incident may unfold for the various components of the health and medical systems and provides additional context for the discipline-related actions outlined in the state and local planners’ playbook.(Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2011;5:S73-S88)Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resource Allocation After a Nuclear Detonation Incident: Unaltered Standards of Ethical Decision MakingDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2011
- Enhancing Hospital Surge Capacity for Mass Casualty EventsJAMA, 2009
- Refining Surge Capacity: Conventional, Contingency, and Crisis CapacityDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2009
- Houston's Medical Disaster Response to Hurricane Katrina: Part 1: The Initial Medical Response From Trauma Service Area QAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Definitive Care for the Critically Ill During a Disaster: Current Capabilities and LimitationsChest, 2008
- Definitive Care for the Critically Ill During a Disaster: A Framework for Allocation of Scarce Resources in Mass Critical CareChest, 2008
- Summary of Suggestions From the Task Force for Mass Critical Care Summit, January 26–27, 2007Chest, 2008
- Definition and Functions of Health Unified Command and Emergency Operations Centers for Large-scale Bioevent Disasters Within the Existing ICSDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2007
- Clinical review: Allocating ventilators during large-scale disasters – problems, planning, and processCritical Care, 2007
- Health care facility and community strategies for patient care surge capacityAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2004