City delineation in European applications of LUTI models: review and tests
- 28 February 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Transport Reviews
- Vol. 38 (1) , 6-32
Abstract
This paper stresses the lack of attention paid to the geographical definitions of cities in LUTI models as one key detrimental aspect to transferring and generalising LUTI results. First, the argumentation develops from a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed publications about LUTI applications in European cities. We show that most authors do not assess findings against potential geographical biases. Second, theoretical simulations are conducted with UrbanSim applied to a synthetic urban area. By varying the geographical limits of the system and population endowments, our simulations confirm that the absence of control on city delineation weakens the results. Finally, the paper suggests methodological guidelines to improve the comparability of LUTI applications and push forward their theoretical agendaKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Defining and characterizing urban boundaries: A fractal analysis of theoretical cities and Belgian citiesComputers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2013
- The Size, Scale, and Shape of CitiesScience, 2008
- How the built environment affects physical activityAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002
- Four applications of the TIGRIS model in the NetherlandsJournal of Transport Geography, 2002
- Appraising large-scale investments in a metropolitan transportation systemTransportation, 1992
- One city, three models: comparison of land‐use/transport policy simulation models for DortmundTransport Reviews, 1991
- The systematic application of the LILT model to Dortmund, Leeds and TokyoTransport Reviews, 1990
- The MEPLAN models of Bilbao, Leeds and DortmundTransport Reviews, 1990
- Ecological Fallacies and the Analysis of Areal Census DataEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 1984
- THE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM IN SPATIAL STATISTICAL ANALYSIS*Journal of Regional Science, 1983