Single– versus Multi–Detector Row CT of the Brain: Quality Assessment
Authors:
- Richard T. KaplanRKRichard T. Kaplan
- Barton LaneBLBarton Lane
- Scott W. AtlasSAScott W. Atlas
- Geoffrey D. RubinGRGeoffrey D. Rubin
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 219 (3) , 750-755
Abstract
To assess the quality of brain computed tomographic (CT) studies obtained with a four-channel multi-detector row CT scanner compared with those obtained with a single-detector row CT scanner. Forty-seven patients referred for brain CT were imaged with both single- and multi-detector row scanners. Single-detector row CT images were acquired by using a 5-mm-collimated beam in the transverse mode. Multi-detector row CT images were acquired in four simultaneous 2.5-mm-thick sections, which were combined in projection space to create two contiguous 5-mm-thick sections. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the acquisition technique independently evaluated the CT image pairs, which were presented in a stacked mode on two adjacent monitors. Each study was graded by using a five-point scale for posterior fossa artifact, overall image quality, and overall preference. Multi-detector row CT studies were acquired 1.8 times faster than single-detector row CT studies (0.92 vs 0.52 section per second). Multi-detector row CT posterior fossa artifact was less than single-detector row CT posterior fossa artifact in 87 (93%) of 94 studies. Overall preference was expressed for multi-detector row CT in 84 (89%) of 94 studies. The differences in mean posterior fossa artifact scores (P <.001) and mean overall image quality scores (P =.001) were significant. Brain CT images obtained with multi-detector row CT resulted in significantly less posterior fossa artifact and were preferred to single-detector row CT images.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stair-Step Artifacts with Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CTRadiology, 2000
- Aorta and Iliac Arteries: Single versus Multiple Detector-Row Helical CT AngiographyRadiology, 2000
- Four Multidetector-Row Helical CT: Image Quality and Volume Coverage SpeedRadiology, 2000
- Cranial CT Artifacts and Gantry AngulationJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1991
- Artifacts in Computed Tomography of the Posterior Fossa: A Comparative Phantom StudyJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1986
- Nonlinear partial volume artifacts in x‐ray computed tomographyMedical Physics, 1980
- A Method for Correcting Bone Induced Artifacts in Computed Tomography ScannersJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1978
- Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 2. Clinical application*British Journal of Radiology, 1973