Beyond Breaches and Battles: Clarifying Important Misconceptions about Emotion
- 31 March 2010
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Emotion Review
- Vol. 2 (2) , 100-104
Abstract
While we share many of the views on emotion research put forth in Kagan’s article “Once More into the Breach,” our commentary focuses on two points of disagreement. First, we argue for the importance of a priori principles. In particular, emotions cannot be understood without reference to final and formal cause, and the related principles of equifinality and equipotentiality. Secondly, although we agree the term “basic emotions” is misleading, we maintain that the emotions traditionally called “basic” should still be seen as a distinct set of emotions by virtue of their being constitutive for other, derived emotions. In conclusion we argue for moving beyond the strict empiricist approach proposed by Kagan and many thinkers before him.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- TARGET ARTICLE: "Putting the Self Into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model"Psychological Inquiry, 2004
- On the Nature of Emotion RegulationChild Development, 2004
- Back to Basics: On the Very Idea of “Basic Emotions”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 2002
- On the Nature of EmotionMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1994
- The Causal Organisation of Emotional Knowledge: A Developmental StudyCognition and Emotion, 1989
- Attachment as an Organizational ConstructChild Development, 1977
- Individual Differences in Physiologic Arousal and Performance in Sport ParachutistsPsychosomatic Medicine, 1972
- Pan-Cultural Elements in Facial Displays of EmotionScience, 1969
- The theory of emotion.Psychological Review, 1895
- The theory of emotion: I: Emotional attitudes.Psychological Review, 1894