The benefits of investments to combat HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria for primary healthcare from 2000 to 2023: An economic modeling analysis
Open Access
- 8 April 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Medicine
- Vol. 23 (4) , e1005036
Abstract
Background: Global investments to combat HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria (HTM) have delivered substantial health gains and may have reduced the burden placed by these diseases on the routine health system. We estimated the reduction in primary healthcare (PHC) utilization resulting from the scale-up of HTM services over 2000–2023 in 108 low- and middle-income countries. Methods and findings: For each disease, we applied established mathematical models to quantify PHC utilization (outpatient visits and inpatient bed-days provided outside of HTM programs) by individuals with symptomatic HIV, tuberculosis, or malaria unable to access HTM-specific services. For each country, we estimated averted PHC utilization by comparing a scenario describing the actual scale-up of HTM services to a counterfactual scenario holding HTM service coverage constant at year 2000 levels. We applied published unit costs to estimate the averted costs resulting from reduced PHC utilization. Over 2000–2023, scale-up of HTM services averted an estimated 6.9 (95% uncertainty interval (UI) [4.4, 10.5]) billion outpatient PHC visits and 3.9 (95% UI [2.5, 5.9]) billion inpatient bed-days, representing US$135 (95% UI [71, 250]) billion in averted costs. These reductions were greatest in sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia and Pacific regions. Across study countries, these reductions represented a median of 4.4% of hospital bed capacity and 1.6% of government health spending in 2023. These percentages were 22.9% and 5.1%, respectively, for low-income countries. Our analysis did not consider changes in PHC services beyond utilization. Also, several inputs were missing in some countries, with missing values estimated using regression imputation. Conclusions: Over recent decades, sustained investments in HTM services in high-burden settings have averted substantial PHC utilization and associated costs. These benefits should be considered when assessing investment impact.Keywords
Funding Information
- Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-043624)
- Medical Research Council (MR/X020258/1)
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-004737)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The case for optimal investment in combating HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria: a global modelling studyThe Lancet, 2025
- Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluationsBMJ, 2022
- Bringing a health systems modelling approach to complex evaluations: multicountry applications in HIV, TB and malariaBMJ Global Health, 2020
- Cost-effectiveness and resource implications of aggressive action on tuberculosis in China, India, and South Africa: a combined analysis of nine modelsThe Lancet Global Health, 2016
- Potential for reduction of burden and local elimination of malaria by reducing Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission: a mathematical modelling studyThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2016
- Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine: a systematic comparison of predictions from four mathematical modelsThe Lancet, 2016
- Spillover effect of HIV-specific foreign aid on immunization services in NigeriaInternational Health, 2015
- Health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of earlier eligibility for adult antiretroviral therapy and expanded treatment coverage: a combined analysis of 12 mathematical modelsThe Lancet Global Health, 2013
- An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systemsThe Lancet, 2009
- An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer ModelsRisk Analysis, 1988