On the position of subjects in Spanish: Evidence from code-switching
Open Access
- 4 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Open Library of the Humanities in Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics
- Vol. 6 (1)
Abstract
Some languages have a fixed subject position, while others are more flexible. Languages like English require pre-verbal subjects; languages like Spanish allow subjects in postverbal position. Because this difference clusters with several linguistic properties distinguishing the two languages, subjects in Spanish and English have been a perennial issue in linguistic theory, touching central problems like the EPP, the nature of cross-linguistic variation, and the relationship between core functional heads. Our project contributes a novel source of evidence to these debates: Spanish/English code-switching. Code-switching, the use of two languages in one utterance, combines the languages’ lexical items and their attendant syntactic features in a single derivation. Because code-switching, like all natural language, is rule-governed, researchers can exploit judgments about the well-formedness of code-switched sentences to draw conclusions about the combinations of features they represent. We report on a formal judgment experiment testing subject position in Spanish/English code-switching as a function of the presence of two functional heads known (from monolingual evidence) to affect subject placement: the C(omplementizer) and T(ense) heads. By manipulating which head appears in which language, we test the availability of post-verbal subjects under different feature combinations. Our results show that post-verbal subjects are only available when both C and T are in Spanish; neither Spanish head alone is sufficient. This finding suggests that the features regulating subject position stem from neither head alone, which is problematic for traditional approaches to the EPP as a feature of T but in line with other recent research on null subjects.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalJournal of Memory and Language, 2013
- Pro ‐drop and Theories of pro in the Minimalist Program Part 1: Consistent Null Subject Languages and the Pronominal‐Agr HypothesisLanguage and Linguistics Compass, 2011
- VOCABULARY KNOWLEDGE AND ADVANCED LISTENING COMPREHENSION IN ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGEStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 2009
- Toward a model of grammaticality judgmentsJournal of Linguistics, 2009
- Two kinds of subjectproStudia Linguistica, 2009
- On the Locality and Motivation of Move and Agree: An Even More Minimal TheoryLinguistic Inquiry, 2007
- On Feature Inheritance: An Argument from the Phase Impenetrability ConditionLinguistic Inquiry, 2007
- Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from FinnishLinguistic Inquiry, 2005
- Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPAÑOL: toward a typology of code-switching1Linguistics, 1980
- Constraints on Language Mixing: Intrasentential Code-Switching and Borrowing in Spanish/EnglishLanguage, 1979