Medical journal editors lacked familiarity with scientific publication issues despite training and regular exposure
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 65 (3) , 247-252
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international surveyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2009
- Training of Peer Reviewers: Validation of a 5-Point Rating ScalePLOS Medicine, 2007
- Reviewing the Reviewers: Comparison of Review Quality and Reviewer Characteristics at the American Journal of RoentgenologyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2005
- Judging the judges: the role of journal editors.QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Reported Training and Experience of Editors in Chief of Specialist Clinical Medical JournalsJAMA, 1998
- What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?JAMA, 1998
- Policies, practices, and attitudes of north american medical journal editorsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1995
- The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviewsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- Editors-in-Chief of Medical JournalsCommunication Research, 1989
- Editors of medical journals: Who and from whereScientometrics, 1985