Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock
- Vol. 3 (2) , 118-22
Abstract
Background : Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. Methods : Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. Results : One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69%). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; P < 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n=19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1−3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25−31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63% in the elective group, 60% in the urgent group, and 54% in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16%, 17%, and 11%, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35%, 31%, and 11%. Conclusion : Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postinjury Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: Are We Winning the Battle?World Journal of Surgery, 2009
- The Use of the Wittmann Patch Facilitates a High Rate of Fascial Closure in Severely Injured Trauma Patients and Critically Ill Emergency Surgery PatientsJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2008
- Open Abdomen after Trauma and Abdominal Sepsis: A Strategy for ManagementJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2006
- Damage-control laparotomyCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 2006
- Staged Management of Giant Abdominal Wall DefectsAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Staged laparotomy for the hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy syndromeThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Reliability of a measure of severity of illness: Acute physiology of chronic health evaluation—IIJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- INTRA-ABDOMINAL COMPARTMENT SYNDROME AS A COMPLICATION OF RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM REPAIR1989
- HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS FOLLOWING SURGICAL RELEASE OF INCREASED INTRA-ABDOMINAL PRESSUREBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1987
- Management of the Major Coagulopathy with Onset during LaparotomyAnnals of Surgery, 1983