The dimensionality of pain: Palliative care and chronic pain patients differ in their reports of pain intensity and pain interference
Authors:
- Peter M. FayersPFPeter M. Fayers
- Marianne J. HjermstadMHMarianne J. Hjermstad
- Pål KlepstadPKPål Klepstad
- Jon Håvard LogeJLJon Håvard Loge
- Augusto CaraceniACAugusto Caraceni
- Geoffrey W. HanksGHGeoffrey W. Hanks
- Petter BorchgrevinkPBPetter Borchgrevink
- Stein KaasaSKStein Kaasa
- 1 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 152 (7) , 1608-1620
Abstract
The accurate, precise, and consistent assessment of pain is of particular importance in palliative care. The European Palliative Care Research Collaborative is developing a computer-based pain assessment instrument and has been evaluating the content and dimensionality of existing pain questionnaires. The most important dimensions of pain are intensity and interference. However, since pain interference is a consequence of and largely reflects pain intensity, we postulated that it might either provide information to enhance the evaluation of intensity, or that an overall summary measure of pain severity could be constructed by combining the 2 dimensions. Cancer patients in palliative care (n=395) and chronic pain patients (n=168) completed questionnaires that included 23 pain items culled from existing questionnaires. Psychometric analyses confirmed the existence of 2 main dimensions, intensity and interference, and also guided identification of items that contributed most strongly to these dimensions. However, there was strong evidence that the relationship between the intensity and the interference items differs markedly in palliative care patients compared to chronic pain patients. As hypothesized, there was strong correlation between intensity and interference, lending support to the possibility that, for some purposes, these dimensions may be combined to provide a higher-level summary measure of patients' pain experience. We conclude that these dimensions should be kept distinct when assessing patients in general, although for a single type of patient (such as palliative care patients), it may be possible to regard intensity and interference as contributing to an overall measure of pain severity.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Commission’s Sixth Framework Programme (LSHC-CT-2006-037777)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chronic non‐malignant pain patients report as poor health‐related quality of life as palliative cancer patientsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2007
- Differential Item Functioning Analysis With Ordinal Logistic Regression TechniquesMedical Care, 2006
- A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of LifeMultivariate Behavioral Research, 2006
- Which Mini-Mental State Exam Items Can Be Used to Screen for Delirium and Cognitive Impairment?Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2005
- Pain Measurement Tools and Methods in Clinical Research in Palliative CareJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2002
- A validation study of an Italian version of the brief pain inventory (Breve questionario per la valutazione del dolore)Pain, 1996
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- “Mini-mental state”Journal of Psychiatric Research, 1975
- Nonlinear Factors in Two DimensionsPsychometrika, 1960
- The Factorial Interpretation of Test DifficultyPsychometrika, 1941