Conflict-Based Models for Real-Time Crash Risk Assessment: A State-of-the-Art Review

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Real-time crash risk assessment is a key component of proactive road safety management, enabling the identification of hazardous conditions within short temporal intervals before crashes occur. Traditional crash-based models are unsuitable for such applications due to the rarity, reporting delay, and stochastic nature of crash data. Traffic conflicts, capturing near-miss interactions between road users, provide a practical alternative for real-time safety analysis. Over the past decade, numerous modelling approaches have been developed to translate conflict information into crash risk estimates; however, the literature remains fragmented and lacks a unified analytical synthesis. This review presents a state-of-the-art, model-centric analysis of conflict-based approaches, classifying them into five paradigms: statistical/regression-based, Bayesian, extreme value theory (EVT), machine learning (ML), and hybrid models. Beyond classification, the study conducts a structured cross-paradigm comparison across key dimensions, including conflict representation, data characteristics, temporal modelling, uncertainty treatment, validation strategies, computational complexity, and operational readiness. The paradigms are further interpreted through the complementary lenses of conflict frequency and severity. The review identifies key research gaps, including fragmented conflict definitions, challenges in modelling rare and extreme events, incomplete treatment of uncertainty and spatiotemporal dynamics, and limitations in validation, transferability, and deployment. Emerging research directions include standardized and adaptive conflict indicators, EVT–machine learning integration, integrated uncertainty-aware frameworks, advanced spatiotemporal modelling, transferable models, and scalable real-time implementation. By combining structured evidence mapping and cross-paradigm synthesis, this study supports model selection, development, and deployment for dynamic crash risk assessment.

This publication has 72 references indexed in Scilit: