Validity and Reliability of the Computer-Administered Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) Tool
Authors:
- 23 October 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Pain Medicine
- Vol. 21 (12) , 3645-3654
Abstract
Objective: The Routine Opioid Outcome Monitoring (ROOM) tool measures outcomes with opioids using an established framework which includes domains such as pain, mood, opioid use disorder, alcohol use, and constipation. This study aims to validate and establish the test-retest reliability of the computer-administered ROOM tool.Design and Setting: Cross-sectional analysis of an online sample.Subjects: Participants comprised those with chronic noncancer pain who regularly used prescription opioids.Methods: Participants self-completed the online ROOM tool along with other validated measures (validation questionnaire), and those who were agreeable also completed the online test-retest questionnaire approximately two weeks later. Subcomponents of the ROOM tool (i.e., pain, mood, alcohol use, opioid use disorder, and constipation) were validated against longer measures of the same construct using Pearson correlation coefficients. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess the stability of the ROOM tool over time.Results: A total of 324 participants completed the validation questionnaire, of whom 260 also completed the test-retest questionnaire. The opioid use disorder domain showed good sensitivity (73.6) and specificity (75.8) against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, any opioid use disorder. All ROOM components showed moderate correlation (r = 0.55–0.73) with their longer counterparts. Test-retest reliability was fair (0.58–0.75), indicating that responses were relatively stable over time. Reliability did vary, however, based on the components being measured and how certain tools were scored.Conclusion: The computer-administered ROOM tool is a valid approach for brief monitoring of outcomes with prescribed opioids in primary care settings and appears to be acceptable to people who are using prescribed opioids for chronic pain.Keywords
Funding Information
- Suzanne Nielsen was supported by NHMRC (#1163961, #1132433)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Access to chronic disease care in general practice: the acceptability of implementing systematic waiting-room screening using computer-based patient-reported risk statusBritish Journal of General Practice, 2013
- Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysisCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2011
- Characteristics of Opioid Prescriptions in 2009JAMA, 2011
- A Single-Question Screening Test for Drug Use in Primary CareArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2010
- The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic reviewGeneral Hospital Psychiatry, 2010
- Validation of the Bowel Function Index to detect clinically meaningful changes in opioid-induced constipationJournal of Medical Economics, 2009
- Development and Initial Validation of the PEG, a Three-item Scale Assessing Pain Intensity and InterferenceJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Primary Care Validation of a Single-Question Alcohol Screening TestJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001