Safety, Feasibility, and Tolerability of Ten Days of At-Home, Remotely Supervised tDCS During Gamified Attention Training in Children with Acquired Brain Injury: An Open-Label, Dose-Controlled Pilot Trial

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Chronic attention problems occur in approximately 25% of children after acquired brain injury (ABI). When delivered daily, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may improve attention; however, access to daily in-clinic tDCS treatment can be limited by other commitments, including concurrent therapy, school commitments, and caregiver schedules. Treatment access can be improved through home-based interventions, though these require several practical and safety considerations in a pediatric ABI population. This study evaluated the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of remotely monitored at-home tDCS during online gamified attention training in pediatric ABI. Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind, dose-controlled clinical trial of at home tDCS in Brisbane, Australia (10 tDCS sessions; 20 min; 1 mA or 2 mA; bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Participants attended our clinic at baseline for clinical assessments, fitting of the personalized tDCS headband, and training in how to use tDCS at home. All sessions were remotely supervised using live videoconferencing. We assessed the feasibility and tolerability of at-home tDCS and our customized, personalized at-home tDCS headband as primary outcomes. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated changes in functional connectivity (fc) and reaction time (RT). Results: Seventy-three participants were contacted over six months (January-June 2023) and ten were enrolled (5 males; mean age: 12.10 y [SD: 2.9]), satisfying a priori recruitment timelines (CONSORT reporting). All families successfully set up tDCS and completed attention training with excellent protocol adherence. There were no serious adverse events over the 100 total sessions. Nine participants completed all stimulation sessions (1 mA: n = 5, 2 mA: n = 4). Participants in the 2 mA group reported greater tingling, itching, and discomfort (all p < 0.05). One participant in the 1 mA group was unable to complete all sessions due to tolerability challenges; however, these challenges were resolved in the second half of the intervention by gradually increasing the stimulation duration across the 10 days alongside additional coaching and support. Conclusions: Overall, daily remotely supervised at-home tDCS in patients with pediatric ABI is safe, feasible, and tolerable. Our results support larger, sham-controlled efficacy trials and provide a foundation for the development of safe and effective at-home stimulation therapeutics that may offer targeted improvement of neurocognitive symptoms in children.
Funding Information
  • Herston Imaging Research Facility (HIRF)
  • University of Queensland Child Health Research Centre
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
  • Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
  • NIHR MindTech MedTech Co-operative
  • National Health Service
  • NIHR
  • Department of Health and Social Care

This publication has 115 references indexed in Scilit: