Smells Like Teen Spirit: Evaluating a Midwestern Teen Court
Authors:
- 12 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 57 (2) , 199-221
Abstract
Teen courts have grown rapidly in the United States despite little evidence of their effectiveness. A survival analysis of 635 teen court and 186 regular diversion participants showed no significant differences in recidivism, although program completers were half as likely to reoffend as noncompleters. Older offenders survived significantly better than younger ones, and girls better than boys. For the full sample, increasing the number of sanctions resulted in earlier reoffending. This effect disappeared when noncompleters were removed from the analysis, suggesting that increasing sanctions may lead certain teens to drop out and/or reoffend. Implications for policy include screening younger juveniles out of teen courts and reconsidering their panacea status.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Teen Court Effective for Repeat Offenders? A Test of the Restorative Justice ApproachInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2005
- Teen Court Referral, Sentencing, and Subsequent Recidivism: Two Proportional Hazards Models and a Little SpeculationCrime & Delinquency, 2004
- The Need for Theory in Assessing Peer CourtsAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2004
- A teen court evaluation with a therapeutic jurisprudence perspectiveBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2002
- Teen Court: An Examination of Processes and OutcomesCrime & Delinquency, 2001
- Sentence Completion and Recidivism among Juveniles Referred to Teen CourtsCrime & Delinquency, 1999
- SPECIALIZATION IN JUVENILE COURT CAREERSCriminology, 1988
- Peer Juries as a Juvenile Justice Diversion TechniqueYouth & Society, 1987
- A Peer Jury in the Juvenile CourtCrime & Delinquency, 1984
- Lower Class Culture as a Generating Milieu of Gang DelinquencyJournal of Social Issues, 1958