Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
Authors:
- 29 September 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Nephrology
- Vol. 5 (11) , 650-657
Abstract
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) is an independent organization with the mission to improve care and outcomes of patients with kidney disease worldwide through the development and coordination of clinical practice guidelines. KDIGO has established firm links with other organizations that have previously produced clinical practice guidelines in the field of kidney disease. The first three KDIGO guidelines—treatment of hepatitis C, management of bone and mineral disease, and care of kidney transplant recipients—have been finalized and the next three—acute kidney injury, management of glomerulonephritis, and management of blood pressure in chronic kidney disease—are under development. The ultimate goal is to cover most major aspects of care for patients with kidney disease. Corner stones of KDIGO's guideline development process are independent, multidisciplinary, international work groups, close collaboration with professional methodology experts who perform systematic evidence reviews, and open public review of each guideline. Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology is applied for grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. International conferences organized by KDIGO support the coordination of guideline development, assess the suitability of guideline topics and help to establish global consensus on definitions and policies.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Special Issue: KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant RecipientsAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2009
- Clinical practice guidelines for anemia in chronic kidney disease: problems and solutions. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney International, 2008
- Introduction to the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of anemia associated with chronic kidney diseaseKidney International, 2008
- Going from evidence to recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?BMJ, 2008
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney International, 2006
- II. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease in AdultsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2006
- Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)Kidney International, 2005
- 2004 Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy Guidelines for Renal Anemia in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients*Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2004