On the need for improved methodologic quality of published reviews
- 1 March 2016
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 103 (3) , 683-684
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic reviewThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2011
- Accruing evidence on benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysisThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Application of Systematic Review Methodology to the Field of NutritionThe Journal of Nutrition, 2008
- Trials and Tribulations of Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesHematology-American Society Hematology Education Program, 2007
- Quality of reviews in epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)BMJ, 1997
- Methodologic Guidelines for Review PapersJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articlesBMJ, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994