The Effect of Changing Fellowship Interview Format on Candidate Ranking Variabilities: The COVID-19 Experience
Authors:
- Ta Chen ChangTCTa Chen Chang
- Elizabeth A. HodappEHElizabeth A. Hodapp
- Richard K. ParrishRPRichard K. Parrish
- Alana L. GrajewskiAGAlana L. Grajewski
- Steven J. GeddeSGSteven J. Gedde
- Richard K. LeeRLRichard K. Lee
- Sarah R. WellikSWSarah R. Wellik
- Anna K. JunkAJAnna K. Junk
- Swarup S. SwaminathanSSSwarup S. Swaminathan
- Elena BitrianEBElena Bitrian
- Adam L. RothmanARAdam L. Rothman
Open Access
- 13 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 2022, 1-6
Abstract
Purpose. This study investigated the effect of interview format changes (in-person to virtual, one-to-one to multiple-to-one) necessitated by the COVID-19 travel restrictions on preliminary fellowship candidate ranking variabilities. Design. Cross-sectional observational study. Method. In 2018 and 2019, the glaucoma fellowship interviews were conducted in-person in a one-to-one format, whereas in 2020, interviews were virtual and in a multiple (interviewers)-to-one (candidate) format. We compared ranking ranges of interviewers within the same virtual room (WSR) and not within the same virtual room (NWSR) to assess the effect of WSR versus NWSR on ranking variabilities. We also compared ranking categories (accept, alternate, and pass) agreements between 2018, 2019, and 2020 to assess the effect of virtual versus in-person interviews on ranking variabilities. Results. NWSR and WSR mean rankings differed by 1.33 (95 confidence interval difference 0.61 to 2.04, p=0.0003), with WSR interviewers having less variability than NWSR pairs. The variability between 2018/2019 (in-person interviews) and 2020 (virtual interviews) showed no differences between in-person and virtual interviews (weighted Kappa statistic 0.086 for 2018, 0.158 for 2019, and 0.101 for 2020; pConclusion. Grouping interviewers WSR during the interview decreased ranking variabilities compared to NWSR, while a change from in-person to virtual interview format did not increase the ranking variabilities. This suggests that the decreased nonverbal interactions in virtual interviews do not decrease interviewers perceptions as applied to preliminary rankings.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH Center Core (P30EY014801, UL1TR002736)
- University of Miami (P30EY014801, UL1TR002736)
- Glaucoma Research Foundation (P30EY014801, UL1TR002736)
- Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute (P30EY014801, UL1TR002736)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P30EY014801, UL1TR002736)
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship ApplicantsOrthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2017
- Videoconference Interviews for an Adult Reconstruction Fellowship: Lessons LearnedJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2017
- Countering cognitive biases in minimising low value careMedical Journal of Australia, 2017
- Factors Used by Program Directors to Select Hand Surgery FellowsThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2014
- The Radiology Fellowship Application and Selection Process in the United States: Experiences and Perceptions from Both SidesRadiology Research and Practice, 2012
- Fellowship Selection Criteria in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryOphthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Ophthalmology Resident Selection: Current Trends in Selection Criteria and Improving the ProcessOphthalmology, 2010
- Fellow Selection CriteriaOphthalmology, 2009
- Body Language Non-Verbal CuesBritish Journal of Perioperative Nursing (United Kingdom), 2000
- Report on a survey of program directors regarding selection factors in graduate medical educationAcademic Medicine, 1979