Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Complete Angina Relief in Symptomatic Patients in the ISCHEMIA Trial
Open Access
- 17 June 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American Heart Association
- Vol. 14 (12) , e040057
Abstract
Background: Patients with chronic coronary disease experience less angina with revascularization plus optimal medical therapy compared with optimal medical therapy alone. However, patients may prefer to better understand their individual likelihood of complete angina relief associated with each treatment approach before selecting a strategy. We therefore sought to determine the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of complete angina relief in symptomatic patients treated with invasive management using revascularization plus optimal medical therapy or conservative therapy with optimal medical therapy alone in the ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial. Methods: Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency (AF) score. We analyzed patients in the invasive management treatment arm with angina at baseline (Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency <100) who underwent revascularization and all patients in the conservative therapy arm with angina at baseline. The primary outcome was angina status at 12 months defined as a Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency=100 (complete angina relief) or Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency <100 (persistent angina). The association of angina status with the composite of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction was assessed at 5 years. Results: Among 1376 patients in the conservative therapy arm with angina at baseline, 50% experienced complete angina relief at 12 months. Independent predictors included older age, male sex, recent angina onset, and less baseline angina. Among 1158 patients who underwent revascularization, 70% achieved complete angina relief. Predictors included younger age, nonsmoking, coronary artery bypass graft, and less baseline angina. Cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction rates at 5 years did not differ between patients with or without complete angina relief. Conclusions: Complete angina relief at 12 months in symptomatic patients with chronic coronary disease was achieved in 70% of patients undergoing revascularization and 50% of patients treated ith conservative therapy and did not influence cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction outcomes. Registration: https://ischemiatrial.org/ ; ISCHEMIA Trial. Accession Number HLB02742323a.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA TrialJACC, 2023
- Complete Revascularization and Angina-Related Health Status in the ISCHEMIA TrialJACC, 2023
- Interpretation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire as an Outcome Measure in Clinical Trials and Clinical CareJAMA Cardiology, 2021
- Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA Cardiology, 2019
- International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and designAmerican Heart Journal, 2018
- Thermodilutional Confirmation of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Recurrent Angina After Successful Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCanadian Journal of Cardiology, 2015
- Persistent angina: highly prevalent and associated with long-term anxiety, depression, low physical functioning, and quality of life in stable angina pectorisClinical Research in Cardiology, 2013
- Recurrence of angina after coronary artery bypass surgery: Predictors and prognosis (CASS registry)JACC, 1995
- Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery diseaseJACC, 1995
- Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994