Earnings Management and Capital Resource Allocation: Evidence from China's Accounting-Based Regulation of Rights Issues
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in The Accounting Review
- Vol. 79 (3) , 645-665
Abstract
From 1996 to 1998, listed companies in China were required to achieve a minimum return on equity (ROE) of 10 percent in each of the previous three years before they could apply for permission to issue additional shares. As a result of this rule, there was a heavy concentration of ROEs in the area just above 10 percent. We show that the Chinese regulators appear to have scrutinized firms using excess amounts of nonoperating income to reach the 10 percent hurdle. In addition, their ability to do so seems to have improved over time, which allows them to be better able to identify firms that subsequently performed better. However, many firms were still able to gain rights issue approval through excess nonoperating income. We show that these firms subsequently underperformed other approved firms that did not use the same practice, indicating that the Chinese regulators' objective of guiding capital resources toward the well-performing sectors is partially compromised by earnings management.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Sale of Assets to Manage Earnings in JapanJournal of Accounting Research, 2003
- The Mispricing of Abnormal AccrualsThe Accounting Review, 2001
- Do firms mislead investors by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2000
- Financial Packaging of IPO Firms in ChinaJournal of Accounting Research, 2000
- A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard SettingAccounting Horizons, 1999
- Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings1I gratefully acknowledge the comments and suggestions of Philip Berger, Patricia Dechow, Kenneth Gaver (the referee), Robert Holthausen, Wayne Mikkelson (the editor), and Richard Sloan. I also thank Andrew Alford, Brad Barber, Randolph Beatty, Ilia Dichev, Paul Fisher, Gary Gorton, Paul Griffin, David Larcker, Mark Low, Patricia O'Brien, Madhav Rajan, Jay Ritter, Mark Vargus, Robert Verrecchia, Franco Wong, and workshop participants at the 1996 American Accounting Association meetings, Columbia University, Emory University, INSEAD, London Business School, MIT, New York University, Northwestern University, Purdue University, University of California at Davis, University of Chicago, University of Michigan, University of Minnesota, University of Pennsylvania, and Yale University for useful comments. I am indebted to Mark Vargus for access to his FORTRAN sub-routines. Errors and omissions are my responsibility.1Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings11We thank Brad Barber (the referee), Randy Beatty, Vic Bernard, K.C. Chan, Kent Daniel, M. DeFond, Laura Field, David Heike, Chuan Yang Hwang, Jonathan Karpoff, S.P. Kothari, Charles Lee, Wayne Mikkelson (the editor), Tim Opler, Krishna Palepu, K. Ramesh, Jay Ritter, Terry Shevlin, Doug Skinner, Sheridan Titman, Ross Watts, Jerry Zimmerman, and seminar participants at the University of California Finance and Accounting Conference (Davis, March 1995), the NBER Corporate Finance Conference (Boston, August 1995), the Center for Research in Security Prices Seminar (Chicago, October 1995), the American Finance Association Conference (San Francisco, 1996), the American Accounting Association Conference (Chicago, August 1996), the University of Michigan, and the University of Rochester for helpful comments and discussions.Journal of Financial Economics, 1998
- Discretionary behavior with respect to allowances for loan losses and the behavior of security pricesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1996