Word-of-Mouth as Self-Enhancement
Authors:
Preprint
- 25 April 2008
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In this research we predict and demonstrate that consumers' propensities to generate word-of-mouth (WOM) is affected by their motivation to self-enhance, that is, to seek experiences that bolster the self-concept. Data from three experiments and an empirical analysis of real-world WOM indicate that self-described consumer experts demonstrate a positivity bias, generating more WOM regarding their satisfying versus their dissatisfying experiences. Importantly, this pattern intensifies when expertise is salient, and it only persists when the experience outcome is attributable to their expertise. In addition to demonstrating the effects and implications of self-enhancement in the WOM context, these insights may partially explain the inconsistencies in previous research regarding the ratio of positive versus negative WOM.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product DomainsJournal of Consumer Research, 2007
- The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi-category studyInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2007
- Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience ContextJournal of Consumer Research, 2005
- Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993
- Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Possessions and the Extended SelfJournal of Consumer Research, 1988
- Attributional influences on consumers' desires to communicate about productsPsychology & Marketing, 1987
- Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot StudyJournal of Marketing, 1983
- The Effect of Experience: A Matter of Salience?Journal of Consumer Research, 1980
- Changing Brand Attitudes Through Modification of Cognitive StructureJournal of Consumer Research, 1975