Hydrograph Separation Using Continuous Open System Isotope Mixing
Authors:
- David M. HarrisDHDavid M. Harris
- Jeffrey J. McDonnellJMJeffrey J. McDonnell
- Allan RodheARAllan Rodhe
Open Access
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- surface water-and-climate
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 31 (1) , 157-171
Abstract
We propose a new hydrograph separation method for runoff source modeling based on continuous open system isotope mixing using a variable source area and three isotopic reservoirs. The three reservoirs are (1) direct precipitation on saturated areas, (2) a near‐stream saturated zone, and (3) subsurface water in upslope areas. The reservoir sizes and isotopic compositions evolve due to continuous, open system mixing. Streamflow is composed of rainfall on saturated areas and water exfiltrated from the near‐stream saturated zone. The contributing source fractions are determined using the observed isotopic compositions of the stream and the modeled isotopic compositions of the contributing reservoirs, which are functions of time. The near‐stream saturated zone receives inflow from upslope areas which are not surface saturated. The surface‐saturated area changes dynamically based on the difference between lateral inflow and contributions to streamflow from the near‐stream saturated zone. The upslope zone (reservoir 3) evolves by mixing with rainfall. This hydrograph separation method requires (1) a function which relates the amount of water stored in the near‐stream saturated zone to saturated area, (2) a function which relates saturated area fraction to total streamflow, and (3) knowledge of the water storage capacity in reservoirs 2 and 3. The hydrograph separation method was applied to oxygen isotope data for rainfall and runoff during a 36‐hour storm at the Gårdsjön F1 catchment in southwestern Sweden. The hydrograph separation method was used to estimate time‐dependent streamflow contributions due to overland flow of storm rainfall and subsurface flow of mainly preevent water. We also used the separation method to estimate parameters for relations between saturated area fraction and streamflow, and saturated area and subsurface water storage. We show that streamflow contributions from overland flow may be described by a simple analytic function of antecedent conditions and catchment parameters.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Three‐dimensional modelling of hillslope hydrologyHydrological Processes, 1992
- Towards identifying sources of subsurface flow: A comparison of components identified by a physically based runoff model and those determined by chemical mixing techniquesHydrological Processes, 1992
- Streamflow generation in a headwater basin on the precambrian shieldHydrological Processes, 1991
- Deuterium variations in storm rainfall: Implications for stream hydrograph separationWater Resources Research, 1990
- Three-component tracer model for stormflow on a small Appalachian forested catchmentJournal of Hydrology, 1988
- Storm Runoff Generation in Humid Headwater Catchments: 2. A Case Study of Hillslope and Low‐Order Stream ResponseWater Resources Research, 1986
- Determination of the components of stormflow using water chemistry and environmental isotopes, Mattole River basin, CaliforniaJournal of Hydrology, 1986
- The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table responseJournal of Hydrology, 1984
- Streamflow generation in a forested watershed, New ZealandWater Resources Research, 1979
- Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England WatershedWater Resources Research, 1970