Time and the management of policy conflict: issues, actors and institutions in the Boston biolaboratory controversy
Author:
- Rob A. DeLeoRDRob A. DeLeo
- 27 April 2015
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Policy Studies
- Vol. 10 (1) , 1-18
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Court Decisions, NIMBY Claims, and the Siting of Unwanted Facilities: Policy Frames and the Impact of Judicialization in Locating a Landfill for Toronto's Solid WasteCanadian Public Policy, 2011
- Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater YellowstonePolicy Sciences, 2010
- Alliance Building across Social Movements: Bridging Difference in a Peace and Justice CoalitionSocial Problems, 2009
- Intractable Conflict as an AttractorAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2007
- The Representational Biases of Federalism: Scope and Bias in the Political Process, RevisitedPerspectives on Politics, 2007
- The “Mouse That Roared”: Agenda Setting in Canadian Pesticides PoliticsPolicy Studies Journal, 2006
- A PACT Against Conflict Escalation in Negotiation and Dispute ResolutionCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2005
- Politics in Time2004
- THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.Academy of Management Journal, 2001
- Reinterpreting Locational Conflicts: NIMBY and nuclear waste management in SwedenPolicy & Politics, 1992