Early-Stage Australian HCC Patients Treated at Tertiary Centres Show Comparable Survival Across Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Residency
Authors:
- Jonathan AbdelmalakJAJonathan Abdelmalak
- Simone I. StrasserSSSimone I. Strasser
- Natalie L. NguNNNatalie L. Ngu
- Claude DennisCDClaude Dennis
- Marie SinclairMSMarie Sinclair
- Avik MajumdarAMAvik Majumdar
- Kate CollinsKCKate Collins
- Katherine BatemanKBKatherine Bateman
- Anouk DevADAnouk Dev
- Joshua H. AbasszadeJAJoshua H. Abasszade
- Zina ValaydonZVZina Valaydon
- Daniel SaittaDSDaniel Saitta
Open Access
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a significant public health challenge in Australia, with poorer survival observed in non-metropolitan populations. This study investigated whether survival disparities persist between non-metropolitan and metropolitan patients if only those with early-stage HCC treated at metropolitan tertiary referral centres are considered. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across ten Australian tertiary centres involving patients with a new diagnosis of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0 or A, recorded from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020. Residential postcodes were entered using the Modified Monash (MM) model to define metropolitan versus non-metropolitan residence. The primary endpoint was adjusted for all-cause mortality. Results: Our study included 854 patients (metropolitan n = 612, and non-metropolitan n = 242) with a median follow-up of 42.6 months. We found no significant survival or mortality differences between the two groups with the unadjusted Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log-rank test p = 0.612) and with the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (adjusted HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64–1.34, p = 0.690). As expected, tumour burden, Child–Pugh Score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significant predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that previously observed survival disparities may stem from delayed diagnosis and reduced access to tertiary care in non-metropolitan regions and highlight the need for improved HCC surveillance and referral pathways, particularly for rural and Indigenous communities, to mitigate geographic inequities.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monitoring quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma: A modified Delphi consensusHepatology Communications, 2022
- Survival of primary liver cancer for people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in AustraliaCancer Epidemiology, 2022
- Caring for someone with cancer in rural AustraliaSupportive Care in Cancer, 2022
- Quality measures in HCC care by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver DiseasesHepatology, 2021
- Remoteness of residence predicts tumor stage, receipt of treatment, and mortality in patients with hepatocellular carcinomaJGH Open, 2021
- Racial and Sex Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the USACurrent Hepatology Reports, 2020
- Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma from more rural and lower‐income households have more advanced tumor stage at diagnosis and significantly higher mortalityCancer, 2020
- Effect of fragmentation of cancer care on treatment use and survival in hepatocellular carcinomaCancer, 2019
- Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 updateHepatology International, 2017
- Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index for predicting survival after liver transplantationLiver Transplantation, 2007