Cluster Differences in Antibiotic Resistance, Biofilm Formation, Mobility, and Virulence of Clinical Enterobacter cloacae Complex
Open Access
- 6 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Microbiology
- Vol. 13, 814831
Abstract
Due to the lack of research on the characteristics of different clusters of Enterobacter cloacae complex (ECC), this study aimed to characterize and explore the differences among species of the ECC. An analysis based on hsp60 showed that Enterobacter hormaechei was predominant in ECC. Interestingly, the antibiotic resistance rates of clusters were different, among which E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii (cluster VIII) and Enterobacter cloacae IX (cluster IX) possessed high resistant rates to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, but cluster II (Enterobacter kobei) had low resistant rates. Cluster II exhibited a strong biofilm formation ability. Different motility and protease production ability were shown for distinct clusters. A PCR analysis showed that clusters I, III, VI, VIII, and IX carried more virulence genes, while cluster II had fewer. Clusters I, VIII, and IX with high pathogenicity were evaluated using the Galleria mellonella infection model. Thus, the characteristics of resistance, biofilm-forming ability, mobility, and virulence differed among the clusters. The strains were divided into 12 subgroups based on hsp60. The main clusters of ECC clinical strains were I, II, III, VI, VIII, and IX, among which IX, VIII, and I were predominant with high resistance and pathogenicity, and cluster II (E. kobei) was a special taxon with a strong biofilm formation ability under nutrient deficiency, but was associated with low resistance, virulence, and pathogenicity. Hence, clinical classification methods to identify ECC subgroups are an urgent requirement to guide the treatment of clinical infections.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fatal sepsis caused by an unusual Klebsiella species that was misidentified by an automated identification systemJournal of Medical Microbiology, 2013
- Enterobactin is required for biofilm development in reduced‐genome Escherichia coliEnvironmental Microbiology, 2011
- Specific Distribution within the Enterobacter cloacae Complex of Strains Isolated from Infected Orthopedic ImplantsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Genomic Diversity within the Enterobacter cloacae ComplexPLOS ONE, 2008
- Cronobacter gen. nov., a new genus to accommodate the biogroups of Enterobacter sakazakii, and proposal of Cronobacter sakazakii gen. nov., comb. nov., Cronobacter malonaticus sp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov., Cronobacter genomospecies 1, and of three subspecies, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis subsp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis subsp. nov. and Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi subsp. nov.International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2008
- Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB Genes as Molecular Markers for Microbial Ecology StudiesApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007
- Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. oharae subsp. nov., E. hormaechei subsp. hormaechei comb. nov., and E. hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii subsp. nov., Three New Subspecies of Clinical ImportanceJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Development of a rapid identification method for Klebsiella pneumoniae phylogenetic groups and analysis of 420 clinical isolatesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2004
- Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections in US Hospitals: Analysis of 24,179 Cases from a Prospective Nationwide Surveillance StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Population Genetics of the Nomenspecies Enterobacter cloacaeApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003