Cross-Language Differential Item Functioning of the Job Content Questionnaire Among European Countries: The JACE Study
Open Access
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 16 (2) , 136-147
Abstract
Little is known about cross-language measurement equivalence of the job content questionnaire (JCQ) The purposes of this study were to assess the extent of cross-language differential item functioning (DIF) of the 27 JCQ items in six languages (French, Dutch, Belgian-French, Belgian-Dutch (Flemish), Italian, and Swedish) from six European research centers and to test whether its effects on the scale-level mean comparisons among the centers were substantial or not. A partial gamma coefficient method was used for statistical DIF analyses where the Flemish JCQ was the reference for other language versions. Additionally, equivalence between the Flemish and Dutch translations was subjected to a judgmental review. On average, 36% to 39% of the total tested items appeared to be cross-language DIF items in the statistical analyses. The judgmental review indicated that half of the DIF items may be associated with translation difference. The impacts of the DIF items on the mean comparisons of the JCQ scales between the centers were non-trivial: underestimated skill discretion (Milan), underestimated decision authority (Leiden), underestimated psychological demands (Milan women), and incomparable coworker support (Gothenburg 95). Cross-language DIF of the JCQ among European countries should be considered in international comparative studies on psychosocial job hazards using JCQ scales.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Item Response Theory and Confirmatory Factor Analytic Methodologies for Establishing Measurement Equivalence/InvarianceOrganizational Research Methods, 2004
- Examining the Effects of Differential Item (Functioning and Differential) Test Functioning on Selection Decisions: When Are Statistically Significant Effects Practically Important?Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004
- Job stress, absenteeism and coronary heart disease European cooperative study (the JACE study). Design of a multicentre prospective studyEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1999
- In pursuit of quality: Issues for cross-national survey researchInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1999
- Measuring job stressors and strains: Where we have been, where we are, and where we need to go.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1998
- Job stress and cardiovascular disease: A theoretic critical review.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- Current issues relating to psychosocial job strain and cardiovascular disease research.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- Job stress and cardiovascular disease: A theoretic critical review.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1996
- A Central Question in Cross-Cultural Research: Do Employees of Different Cultures Interpret Work-related Measures in an Equivalent Manner?Journal of Management, 1994
- Quantitative methods in cross‐national management research: Trends and equivalence issuesJournal of Organizational Behavior, 1991