Doing involvement: A qualitative study exploring the ‘work’ of involvement enacted by older people and their carers during transition from hospital to home
Open Access
- 2 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 24 (6) , 1936-1947
Abstract
Context: Being involved in one's care is prioritised within UK healthcare policy to improve care quality and safety. However, research suggests that many older people struggle with this.Design: We present focused ethnographic research exploring older peoples' involvement in healthcare from hospital to home.Results: We propose that being involved in care is a dynamic form of labour, which we call ‘involvement work’ (IW). In hospital, many patients ‘entrust’ IW to others; indeed, when desired, maintaining control, or being actively involved, was challenging. Patient and professionals' expectations, alongside hospital processes, promoted delegation; staff frequently did IW on patients' behalf. Many people wanted to resume IW postdischarge, but struggled because they were out of practice.Discussion: Preference and capacity for involvement was dynamic, fluctuating over time, according to context and resource accessibility. The challenges of resuming IW were frequently underestimated by patients and care providers, increasing dependence on others post‐discharge and negatively affecting peoples' sense and experience of (in)dependence.Conclusions: A balance needs to be struck between respecting peoples' desire/capacity for non‐involvement in hospital while recognising that ‘delegating’ IW can be detrimental. Increasing involvement will require patient and staff roles to be reframed, though this must be done acknowledging the limits of patient desire, capability,and resources. Hospital work should be (re)organised to maximise involvement where possible and desired.Patient/Public Contribution: Our Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Panel contributed to research design, especially developing interview guides and patient‐facing documentation. Patients were key participants within the study; it is their experiences represented.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health Research (RP‐PG‐1214‐20017)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related OutcomesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2011
- Cultural Health CapitalJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 2010
- Come take a walk with me: The “Go-Along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-beingHealth & Place, 2009
- Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual frameworkPatient Education and Counseling, 2006
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006
- Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and Measuring Activation in Patients and ConsumersHealth Services Research, 2004
- Promoting independence: but promoting what and how?Ageing and Society, 2003
- Patient safety: what about the patient?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2002
- Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative dataBMJ, 2000
- Patient participation - a review of the literatureJournal of Clinical Nursing, 1998