A comparison of the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese EQ-5D descriptive systems
Authors:
- 25 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 22 (8) , 2237-2243
Abstract
To compare the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L descriptive systems. Members of the general populations in the UK, Spain, France, and China were interviewed to measure the severity of health problems represented by the response labels used in the EQ-5D descriptive systems using a visual analog scale. Multiple linear regression models were used to compare the perceived label severity across the four language groups. Severity scores for labels from each EQ-5D-5L dimension scale were compared with each other to assess ordinality. EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L labels used for describing different levels of health problems were rated differently, while those describing the same level of health problems were rated similarly. For example, the deviation of any group mean from the grand severity mean score for the label ‘slight(ly)’ was no larger than 5 points on a 0–100 scale for all five EQ-5D dimensions (p > 0.05 for all, t tests). Label ratings violating hypothesized ordinality of the EQ-5D-5L scales were observed in only a small proportion of respondents. Our study provided some preliminary evidence supporting the ordinality and equivalence of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L descriptive systems across four major languages.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system: the response scaling approachQuality of Life Research, 2012
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Quality of Life Research, 2011
- Interpretation of response categories in patient-reported rating scales: a controlled study among people with Parkinson's diseaseHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2010
- The minimally important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Raynaud's condition score in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon in a large randomised controlled clinical trialAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2010
- The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled TrialsThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2009
- The Minimally Important Difference for the Fatigue Visual Analog Scale in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Followed in an Academic Clinical PracticeThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2008
- Quantification of the level descriptors for the standard EQ-5D three-level system and a five-level version according to two methodsQuality of Life Research, 2008
- A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnairesActa Paediatrica, 2004
- EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol GroupAnnals of Medicine, 2001
- The Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Physician–assigned Visual Analog Pain ScoresAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996