PRevalence of Abuse and Intimate Partner Violence Surgical Evaluation (P.R.A.I.S.E.): rationale and design of a multi-center cross-sectional study.
Author:
- PRAISE InvestigatorsPIPRAISE Investigators
Open Access
- 23 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Vol. 11 (1) , 77
Abstract
Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is described by the American Medical Association as "a pattern of coercive behaviors that may include repeated battering and injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive social isolation, deprivation, and intimidation." The long-term consequences of IPV include health risks, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and staggering economic costs for health care of victims. Intimate partner violence is often underreported among women who seek medical attention. The current study seeks to address the issue of possible underreporting of IPV in orthopaedic fracture clinics by establishing prevalence rates of IPV among women seeking treatment for musculoskeletal injuries. Methods/Design: We propose a cross-sectional multicenter study wherein 3,600 women will complete a self-reported written questionnaire across clinical sites in North America, Europe, and Australia. Recruitment of participants will take place at orthopaedic fracture clinics at each clinical site. The questionnaire will contain a validated set of questions used to screen for IPV, as well as questions that pertain to the participant's demographic, injury characteristics, and experiences with health care utilization. Female patients presenting to the orthopaedic fracture clinics will complete two validated self-reported written questionnaires (Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) and the Partner Violence Screen (PVS)) to determine the prevalence of IPV in the past 12 months and in their lifetime. The two questionnaires were designed for rapid assessment of IPV status in emergency departments, family practice, and women's health clinics that we believe are similar to our intended setting of an orthopaedic clinic. Discussion: If the prevalence of IPV among women attending orthopaedic clinics is greater than the current perceptions of orthopaedic surgeons, this study will serve to advocate for the continued education of medical professionals to better recognize probable IPV cases and offer existing services to enhance the care of these patients.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intimate Partner Violence Screening ToolsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2009
- Domestic Violence: The “Rule of Thumb”: 2008 Western Trauma Association Presidential AddressJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2008
- (Mis)Perceptions About Intimate Partner Violence in Women Presenting for Orthopaedic Care: A Survey of Canadian Orthopaedic SurgeonsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2008
- Early Detection and Prevention of Domestic Violence Using the Women Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) in Primary Health Care Clinics in MalaysiaAsia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 2008
- Randomized Comparison of 3 Methods to Screen for Domestic Violence in Family PracticeThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2007
- Abused Women Disclose Partner Interference with Health Care: An Unrecognized Form of BatteringJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Musculoskeletal Manifestations of Physical Abuse After Intimate Partner Violence2006
- Should Health Professionals Screen All Women for Domestic Violence?PLOS Medicine, 2004
- A Positive Domestic Violence Screen Predicts Future Domestic ViolenceJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2004
- Victims of Domestic Violence on the Trauma Service: Unrecognized and Underreported2003