ACL-QL: Adaptive Conservative Level in Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning
- 28 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Vol. 36 (6) , 11399-11413
Abstract
Offline reinforcement learning (RL), which operates solely on static datasets without further interactions with the environment, provides an appealing alternative to learning a safe and promising control policy. The prevailing methods typically learn a conservative policy to mitigate the problem of $Q$ -value overestimation, but it is prone to overdo it, leading to an overly conservative policy. Moreover, they optimize all samples equally with fixed constraints, lacking the nuanced ability to control conservative levels in a fine-grained manner. Consequently, this limitation results in a performance decline. To address the above two challenges in a united way, we propose a framework, adaptive conservative level in $Q$ -learning (ACL-QL), which limits the $Q$ -values in a mild range and enables adaptive control on the conservative level over each state–action pair, i.e., lifting the $Q$ -values more for good transitions and less for bad transitions. We theoretically analyze the conditions under which the conservative level of the learned $Q$ -function can be limited in a mild range and how to optimize each transition adaptively. Motivated by the theoretical analysis, we propose a novel algorithm, ACL-QL, which uses two learnable adaptive weight functions to control the conservative level over each transition. Subsequently, we design a monotonicity loss and surrogate losses to train the adaptive weight functions, $Q$ -function, and policy network alternatively. We evaluate ACL-QL on the commonly used datasets for deep data-driven reinforcement learning (D4RL) benchmark and conduct extensive ablation studies to illustrate the effectiveness and state-of-the-art performance compared with existing offline DRL baselines.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Survey on Offline Reinforcement Learning: Taxonomy, Review, and Open ProblemsIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023
- Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Robotics Exploration: A SurveyIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021
- Deep Reinforcement Learning on Autonomous Driving Policy With Auxiliary Critic NetworkIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021
- Deductive Reinforcement Learning for Visual Autonomous Urban Driving NavigationIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2021
- Pseudo-rehearsal: Achieving deep reinforcement learning without catastrophic forgettingNeurocomputing, 2021
- Feature Control as Intrinsic Motivation for Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019
- Adaptive $Q$ -Learning for Data-Based Optimal Output Regulation With Experience ReplayIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2018
- Self-Paced Prioritized Curriculum Learning With Coverage Penalty in Deep Reinforcement LearningIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018
- Stability Analysis of Discrete-Time Infinite-Horizon Optimal Control With Discounted CostIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2016
- A Survey of Monte Carlo Tree Search MethodsIEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 2012