Occupations and the Structure of Wage Inequality in the United States, 1980s to 2000s
Authors:
- 3 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Sociological Review
- Vol. 75 (3) , 402-431
Abstract
Occupations are central to the stratification systems of industrial countries, but they have played little role in empirical attempts to explain the well-documented increase in wage inequality that occurred in the United States in the 1980s and 1990s. We address this deficiency by assessing occupation-level effects on wage inequality using data from the Current Population Survey for 1983 through 2008. We model the mean and variance of wages for each occupation, controlling for education and demographic factors at the individual level to test three competing explanations for the increase in wage inequality: (1) the growth of between-occupation polarization, (2) changes in education and labor force composition, and (3) residual inequality unaccounted for by occupations and demographic characteristics. After correcting for a problem with imputed data that biased Kim and Sakamoto’s (2008) results, we find that between-occupation changes explain 66 percent of the increase in wage inequality from 1992 to 2008, although 23 percent of this is due to the switch to the 2000 occupation codes in 2003. Sensitivity analysis reveals that 18 percent of the increase in inequality from 1983 to 2002 is due to changes in just three occupations: managers “not elsewhere classified,” secretaries, and computer systems analysts.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the RevisionistsReview of Economics and Statistics, 2008
- Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in BritainReview of Economics and Statistics, 2007
- What Has Sociology to Contribute to the Study of Inequality Trends? A Historical and Comparative PerspectiveAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 2007
- The Polarization of the U.S. Labor MarketAmerican Economic Review, 2006
- Match Bias in Wage Gap Estimates Due to Earnings ImputationJournal of Labor Economics, 2004
- Skill‐Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and PuzzlesJournal of Labor Economics, 2002
- Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor MarketJournal of Economic Literature, 2002
- Can Class Analysis Be Salvaged?American Journal of Sociology, 1998
- The structure of occupational inequalityQuality & Quantity, 1981
- Bringing the Firms Back in: Stratification, Segmentation, and the Organization of WorkAmerican Sociological Review, 1980