Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
- Vol. 119 (1) , 191-203
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Ministry of Science and Technology (106-2622-E-182-002-CC2)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CTDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2013
- Comparison of Soft Tissue Cephalometric Norms between Turkish and European‐American AdultsThe Scientific World Journal, 2013
- New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and normal occlusionThe Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 2013
- Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering programin vivoDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2011
- 3D CBCT McNamara's cephalometric analysis in an adult southern Chinese populationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011
- New 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic SurgeryJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011
- Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric imagesThe Angle Orthodontist, 2011
- Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adultsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2010
- 3D vs. 2D cephalometric analysis comparisons with repeated measurements from 20 Thai males and 20 Thai femalesBiomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 2009
- A comparison between two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skullsEuropean Journal of Oral Sciences, 2009