- 1 April 2025
- journal article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Physics of Fluids
- Vol. 37 (4)
Abstract
The stable numerical integration of shocks in compressible flow simulations relies on the reduction or elimination of Gibbs phenomena (unstable, spurious oscillations). A popular method to virtually eliminate Gibbs oscillations caused by numerical discretization in under-resolved simulations is to use a flux limiter. A wide range of flux limiters have been studied in the literature, with recent interest in their optimization via machine learning methods trained on high-resolution datasets. The common use of flux limiters in numerical codes as plug-and-play blackbox components makes them key targets for design improvement. Even for deterministic dynamical models, numerical uncertainty is introduced via coarse-graining required by insufficient computational power to solve all scales of motion. Conventional flux limiters are deterministic and lack the capacity to address uncertainties, both aleatoric (inherent randomness) and epistemic (modeling uncertainty due to limited knowledge), which arise in coarse-grained numerical simulations. Here, we introduce a conceptually distinct type of flux limiter that is designed to handle the effects of randomness in the model and uncertainty in model parameters. Unlike traditional single-function flux limiters, these new probabilistic flux limiters incorporate multiple flux limiting functions, each applied with a learned probability drawn from high-resolution data to mitigate the effects of uncertainty in numerical simulations. This approach departs from traditional single-function limiters by explicitly modeling and incorporating uncertainty into the shock capturing process. Using the example of Burgers' equation as a testbed, we show that a machine learned, probabilistic flux limiter may be used in a shock capturing code to more accurately capture shock profiles. In particular, we show that our probabilistic flux limiter outperforms standard limiters and can be successively improved upon (up to a point) by expanding the set of probabilistically chosen flux limiting functions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Los Alamos National Laboratory (89233218CNA000001)
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Machine learning changes the rules for flux limitersPhysics of Fluids, 2022
- A review on TVD schemes and a refined flux-limiter for steady-state calculationsJournal of Computational Physics, 2015
- Optimal Uncertainty QuantificationSIAM Review, 2013
- Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flowsNew Journal of Physics, 2004
- High Resolution Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation LawsJournal of Computational Physics, 1997
- Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemesJournal of Computational Physics, 1988
- High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation LawsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1984
- The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulationsJournal of Computational Physics, 1984
- Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's methodJournal of Computational Physics, 1979
- On a quasi-linear parabolic equation occurring in aerodynamicsQuarterly of Applied Mathematics, 1951