Environmental ethics and possibility studies
Open Access
- 23 May 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Possibility Studies & Society
- Vol. 1 (1-2) , 172-177
Abstract
Possibilities are not neutral. Our engagement with the possible – the possibilities we value and the possibilities we ignore – will, to a degree, always be constrained by the moral universe we inhabit. Philosophy has always been concerned with normative questions – how should we live, what should we value? With growing inequality, rapid and potentially destructive technological development, and multiple environmental crises, the limits of traditional ethical and political philosophies are becoming apparent, particularly in areas focused on novel technologies and the environment. There can be an extremely fruitful dialogue between Possibility Studies and environmental ethics in examining the possibility of realising novel ethical frameworks to help us navigate the myriad problems of the world.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospectsMeat Science, 2012
- IntroductionMedicine, Conflict and Survival, 2012
- Health Message Framing Effects on Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior: A Meta-analytic ReviewAnnals of Behavioral Medicine, 2011
- Hope, Self-Transcendence and Environmental EthicsInquiry, 2010
- Radical Hope for Living Well in a Warmer WorldJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2009
- Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-use Dilemma in the Biological SciencesScience and Engineering Ethics, 2007
- The Dual-Use Dilemma for the Life Sciences: Perspectives, Conundrums, and Global SolutionsBiosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2006
- Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of RationalismHypatia, 1991
- Is There an Ecological Ethic?Ethics, 1975
- The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗Inquiry, 1973