Postsurgical Outcomes with Meshes for Two-stage Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction in 20,817 Patients
Open Access
- 7 December 2022
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
- Vol. 10 (12) , e4699
Abstract
Background: Use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) for tissue expander breast reconstruction remains controversial with an uncertain safety and efficacy profile. This study analyzes the rates and factors for reoperation and postoperative infection in patients who underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction with and without ADM. Methods: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction with and without ADM were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database utilizing CPT codes. Covariates included patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and operative characteristics, while outcomes of interest were postoperative infection and reoperation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Results: There were 8334 patients in the ADM cohort and 12,451 patients who underwent tissue expander breast reconstruction without ADM. There were significantly fewer reoperations in the non-ADM cohort (5.4%) compared to the ADM cohort (7.7%) (P < 0.0001), with infection and hematoma as the most common etiologies in both cohorts. Surgical infections were also more prevalent in the ADM cohort (4.7%) compared with the non-ADM cohort (3.6%) (P < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariate analysis of the tissue expander breast reconstruction cohort revealed race, obesity, hypertension, smoking status, albumin, and operative time as predictive for infection risk, while race, obesity, hypertension, smoking, albumin, operative time, and age were significant for reoperation. Conclusion: Our study of 20,817 patients revealed significantly higher risk of infection and reoperation in patients who underwent breast reconstruction utilizing ADM versus without ADM. Patients considering ADM for breast reconstruction should engage in discussion with their surgeon about complications, aesthetics, and cost.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2012
- The Use of Human Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Correction of Secondary Deformities after Breast Augmentation: Results and CostsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- AlloDerm Performance in the Setting of Prosthetic Breast Surgery, Infection, and IrradiationPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and the Risk of Postoperative ComplicationsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010
- Independent Risk Factors for Infection in Tissue Expander Breast ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Expander/Implant Reconstruction with AlloDerm: Recent ExperiencePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Major Breast OperationJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2008
- The Influence of AlloDerm on Expander Dynamics and Complications in the Setting of Immediate Tissue Expander/Implant ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2008
- Risk factors for postoperative infectionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Submuscular Breast ReconstructionAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 1987