Women’s preferences for interconception care: a discrete choice experiment study
- 5 October 2025
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
- Vol. 52 (2) , 86-94
Abstract
Background: Interconception care (ICC), provided between pregnancies, can improve women’s health, pregnancy outcomes and infant health. Women face challenges in accessing and prioritising ICC due to issues including caring roles, transport and clinician availability. We aimed to elicit women’s preferences for ICC engagement. Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to assess women’s preferences about ICC. Australian women who had experienced pregnancy completed an online survey in March 2024 comprised of questions about sociodemographic characteristics, ICC attitudes regarding informational needs, healthcare professional involvement and service location. We used a mixed logit model to analyse DCE responses, willingness to pay estimates for different attribute levels and applied latent class modelling to explore preference heterogeneity. Free text responses were grouped by key ideas. Results: From 191 responses, numbers were similar across age categories, 46% had experienced pregnancy loss, and 87% had a child/children. Respondents preferred ICC provided by a nurse/midwife, offered during home visits or in-person consultations with a child-friendly waiting area, with appointments lasting 30 or 60 min, and at lower costs. There were no strong preferences regarding appointment wait times. Respondents favoured consultations scheduled up to 1 year after delivery. Follow-up questions indicated that most identified informational needs about emotional and mental health support (74.3%) as important, midwives were a preferred healthcare professional (71.7%) and general practice was the most favoured ICC location (64.9%). Conclusions: Ensuring clinician and setting familiarity, longer appointment times and lower appointment costs will support women’s access to ICC. Policy and funding support are needed for ICC provision.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT ChecklistPharmacoEconomics, 2024
- Strategies to improve postpartum engagement in healthcare after high-risk conditions diagnosed in pregnancy: a narrative reviewArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024
- Addressing reproductive health needs across the life course: an integrated, community-based model combining contraception and preconception careThe Lancet Public Health, 2023
- A scoping review of nutritional interventions and policy guidelines in the interconception period for prevention of noncommunicable diseasesReproductive, Female and Child Health, 2022
- Optimizing interconception care: Rationale for the IMPLICIT modelSeminars in Perinatology, 2020
- Enabling Factors Associated with Receipt of Interconception Health CareMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2019
- Results of a Dutch national and subsequent international expert meeting on interconception careThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2019
- Exploring the need for interventions to manage weight and stress during interconceptionJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2016
- Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical GuideThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2015
- Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: Who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world?International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2015