RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction and impact on major intraprocedural complications (RISE protocol)
- 9 September 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 30 (11) , 2453-2459
Abstract
Background: An internal risk stratification algorithm was developed to decrease the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) during lead extractions (LEs).Objective: To report upon the impact of a risk stratification algorithm (RISE [RIsk Stratification prior to lead Extraction] protocol) on outcomes of LEs in a high‐volume center.Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained LEs database was performed to identify features associated with MACEs. On the basis of the retrospective data, the RISE protocol differentiated LEs procedures into “High” and “Low” risk for occurrence of MACEs. High‐risk LEs included dual‐coil defibrillator lead (≥3 years), pacemaker and single‐coil lead (≥5 years), and any StarFix coronary sinus lead. During the prospective evaluation of the RISE protocol, “High‐risk” LEs were performed in an operating room (OR) or hybrid laboratory with the cardiac anesthesiologist, OR nursing team, perfusionist in the room, and a cardiac surgeon on the premises. “Low‐risk” LEs were performed in the electrophysiology (EP) laboratory with anesthesia provided by EP nursing team. The preintervention (pre‐RISE) and postintervention (post‐RISE) group spanned 19 and 40 months and consisted of 449 (632 leads) and 751 patients (1055 leads), respectively. The primary outcome of MACEs in the two groups was compared.Results: Protocol compliance was 100%. The primary outcome of MACEs occurred in 15 patients (3.34%) before and 12 (1.6%) after implementation of the RISE protocol (P = .04).Conclusion: RISE identified a low‐risk group where minimal resources are needed and allowed for rapid intervention in the high‐risk group that reduced the consequences of MACEs.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the difficulty of a transvenous lead extraction procedure: Validation of the LED indexJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2017
- Balloon-assisted rescue of four consecutive patients with vascular lacerations inflicted during lead extractionHeart Rhythm, 2016
- Value of a Joint Cardiac Surgery-Cardiac Electrophysiology Approach to Lead ExtractionJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2015
- Outcomes and Complications of Lead Removal: Can We Establish a Risk Stratification Schema for a Collaborative and Effective Approach?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2015
- Predicting the difficulty of a lead extraction procedureJournal of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2014
- Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractionsHeart Rhythm, 2014
- Predictors of 30-day and 1-year mortality after transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experienceEP Europace, 2014
- Predictors of Advanced Lead Extraction Based on a Systematic Stepwise Approach: Results from a High Volume CenterPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2013
- Lead Extraction in the Contemporary Setting: The LExICon StudyJACC, 2010
- Laser-Assisted Extraction of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Leads: The Role of the Cardiac SurgeonThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009