Comparison of Capture Rates of the National Cancer Database Across Race and Ethnicity
Open Access
- 1 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA Network Open
- Vol. 6 (12) , e2350237
Abstract
Importance: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) is an invaluable and widely used resource for cancer research, but the current state of representation of different racial and ethnic groups compared with the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) database is unknown.Objective: To examine whether Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals have lower representation in the NCDB compared with the USCS database.Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study assessed individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, and January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, in the NCDB and USCS databases. Data analysis was performed from September 2022 to October 2023.Exposure: Time.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the absolute percentage change (APC) in capture rate across the study period.Results: The cohort included 5 175 007 individuals (0.50% American Indian or Alaska Native, 3.10% Asian or Pacific Islander, 12.01% Black, 6.58% Hispanic, and 77.81% White) who were diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer. Capture rates were the lowest for individuals who were Hispanic (40.83% in 2004-2006 and 54.75% in 2017-2019; P < .001) or American Indian or Alaska Native (20.72% in 2004-2006 and 41.41% in 2017-2019; P < .001). The APCs were positive for both racial categories across all 4 cancers. However, overall APCs for Hispanic individuals (13.92%) remained lower than the overall APCs of White individuals (22.23%; P < .001). The APCs were greater for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals than for White individuals for prostate (14.68% vs 11.57%) and breast (21.61% vs 17.90%) cancer (P < .001), but the APCs for American Indian or Alaska Native individuals were lower than for White individuals for lung cancer (24.54% vs 33.03%; P < .001).Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals diagnosed with cancer in the NCDB, Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native individuals diagnosed with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer were undercaptured in the NCDB, but their representation improved over time. Increased study is needed to determine where these populations predominantly seek cancer care.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in the Use of High-Volume Commission on Cancer-Accredited Hospitals for Cancer Surgery in the United StatesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2018
- Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes ResearchJAMA Oncology, 2017
- Cancer Care Access and Outcomes for American Indian Populations in the United States: Challenges and Models for ProgressSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 2017
- Surveillance for Cancer Incidence and Mortality — United States, 2013Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2017
- Hispanic health in the USA: a scoping review of the literaturePublic Health Reviews, 2016
- Comparison of Cases Captured in the National Cancer Data Base with Those in Population-based Central Cancer RegistriesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2013
- The National Cancer Data Base: A Powerful Initiative to Improve Cancer Care in the United StatesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2008
- Hispanics and the Future of America2006
- Health Service Access, Use, and Insurance Coverage Among American Indians/Alaska Natives and Whites: What Role Does the Indian Health Service Play?American Journal of Public Health, 2004
- The growth and maturation of the national cancer data baseCancer, 1997