Evaluation of protein–RNA Docking Web Servers for Template-Free Docking and Comparison with the AlphaFold Server

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Protein–RNA docking is a valuable tool for predicting the structures of protein–RNA complexes, which allow us to understand the structural basis for gene expression and regulation, thus facilitating drug development. Despite the development of several protein–RNA docking programs, the field remains relatively underdeveloped compared to protein–protein docking, and a systematic comparison of these programs in terms of accuracy and efficiency is still lacking. Recent advances in deep learning-based structure prediction, such as AlphaFold 3, offer a promising alternative for modeling protein–RNA complexes. Here, we have compiled a consolidated benchmark data set of 235 protein–RNA complexes (freely available at https://github.com/tanys-group/protein-rna-docking-benchmark), which were curated from PDB structures deposited up to July 2024, to assess the performance of five template-free docking web servers and the AlphaFold Server. Among the docking web servers, HDOCK performed the best, achieving success rates of 31.1% and 44.7% within the top 1 and top 5 predictions, respectively, as assessed by CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions) metrics. Although AlphaFold 3 outperformed all the docking web servers with an overall success rate of 87.0% in its top 5 predictions, it failed in nine cases where docking approaches succeeded and showed a markedly lower success rate of 40% for protein–RNA complexes outside its training set, comparable to that of HDOCK (35%). Our study provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current protein–RNA docking servers and AlphaFold 3, offering practical guidance for selecting the appropriate tool for protein–RNA complex structure prediction. These results also suggest that hybrid approaches combining physics-based and machine learning methods hold significant promise for achieving higher prediction accuracy.
Funding Information
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research
  • Ministry of Education - Singapore
  • Biomedical Research Council
  • National University of Singapore

This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit: