Relative advantage and complexity: Predicting the rate of adoption of agricultural innovations
Authors:
Open Access
- 6 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Agronomy
- Vol. 4
Abstract
The adoption of new technologies and practices is fundamental to having the capacity to adapt to climate change and ameliorate resource degradation. Consequently, having the ability to predict the scale and rate of adoption by farmers of agricultural innovations is central to gauging their adaptive capacity. It is also crucial to assessing the likely compliance of farmers with change-seeking incentives and regulations. In this paper we describe a novel approach to predicting rates of adoption with respect to agricultural technologies and practices drawing on a dual-process model of consumer decision-making and a method for describing the complexity of innovations in farm systems. We tested the approach using data collected through a survey of dairy farmers in the Waikato and Waipa regions of New Zealand. In the survey we asked 200 farmers, chosen at random, about their perceptions of the complexity and relative advantage of various agricultural and resource management practices, and collected information as to how long it took them to try, and then adopt, the practices. Our results confirm that the process of forming an intention to try or adopt a technology or practice may take several months for relatively simple technologies and practices, and several years for more complex ones. Importantly, we found that novelty in terms of the originality in the components and architecture of a technology or practice does not necessarily correlate with its complexity in terms of integrating it into farm systems. This means that apparently simple technologies and practices that are promoted to reduce resource degradation can be quite difficult to integrate into farm systems and, as a consequence, the costs of integration may act as a strong deterrent to adopting them. A logical implication of our findings is that a deep understanding of the nature of the integration task is essential to anticipating how long it might take for adoption (or compliance) to occur in agriculture and, therefore, to appreciate limits on the adaptive capacity of farmers. Such an understanding requires an intimate knowledge of the, sometimes diverse, farm systems and sub-systems in which the technology or practice is to be integrated.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministry For The Environment
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- The choice of innovation policy instrumentsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013
- Barriers to adoption of sustainable agriculture practices: Change agent perspectivesRenewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 2008
- Improving pathways to adoption: Putting the right P's in precision agricultureComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2008
- Modelling the adoption of organic horticultural technology in the UK using Duration AnalysisAustralian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2003
- Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003
- Nature and Operation of AttitudesAnnual Review of Psychology, 2001
- The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and BehaviorSocial Psychology Quarterly, 1992
- Trying to ConsumeJournal of Consumer Research, 1990
- Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established FirmsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1990
- Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its solutionsJournal of Consumer Marketing, 1989