Cementing the Metaphyseal Stem in Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing: When and Why
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 467 (1) , 79-83
Abstract
Initial fixation of the femoral component in hip resurfacing is key to the enduring survival of the prosthesis. Cementing the metaphyseal stem increases the interface area between bone and cement. We compared the clinical and survivorship results of two groups in a cohort of 1000 hips (838 patients) implanted with Conserve® Plus hip resurfacing; one group was resurfaced with a cemented metaphyseal stem (400 hips; Group 1) and the other with a press-fit stem (600 hips; Group 2). We carried out a time-dependent analysis to determine the indications for cementing the stem. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 98.2% for Group 1 and 94.4% for Group 2, using any revision as an endpoint. Femoral aseptic failure was reduced in Group 1 compared to Group 2. Cementing the metaphyseal stem is particularly effective for hips with a small femoral component size (< 48 mm) and hips with large femoral defects (> 1 cm). There was no difference between groups in incidence of femoral neck narrowing or femoral neck fractures. Longer followup is needed to determine if cementing the stem can be detrimental to the long-term durability of the femoral implant. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Eleven Years of Experience With Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip ResurfacingThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2008
- Results of Conserve®Plus Hip Resurfacing2008
- Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hipThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- The Effects of Technique Changes on Aseptic Loosening of the Femoral Component in Hip Resurfacing. Results of 600 Conserve Plus With a 3 to 9 Year Follow-upThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2007
- Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Response to physiological loadsClinical Biomechanics, 2007
- Belgium Experience with Metal-on-Metal Surface ArthroplastyOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2005
- Hydroxyapatite-Coated Femoral Implant in Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum of Two Years Follow-UpOrthopedic Clinics of North America, 2005
- Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacingsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- A 12-Item Short-Form Health SurveyMedical Care, 1996