High hopes for front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition labels? A conjoint analysis on the trade-offs between a FOP label, nutrition claims, brand and price for different consumer segments
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Universiteit Antwerpen
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (1SE6821N)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unhealthy food is not tastier for everybody: The “healthy=tasty” French intuitionFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probioticsFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experimentHealth Economics, 2011
- Influence of three non-sensory factors on consumer choice of functional yogurts over regular onesFood Quality and Preference, 2010
- Consumer attitudes and loyalty towards private brandsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies, 2010
- Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choicePublic Health Nutrition, 2010
- Impact of consumers' health beliefs, health involvement and risk perception on fish consumptionBritish Food Journal, 2008
- Choosing Brands: Fresh Produce versus Other ProductsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008
- Whatever people say I am, that's what I am: Social labeling as a social marketing toolInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2007
- Do consumers value nutritional labels?European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2006