Audit committee and financial reporting fraud: the moderating role of firm size
Authors:
- 20 March 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
- Vol. ahead-of-p (ahead-of-p)
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine whether firm size moderates the relationship between audit committee (AC) characteristics and financial statements fraud (FFR) among listed firms in the East African Community (EAC). Design/methodology/approach: This study analyzed a sample of 33 nonfinancial firms listed in the EAC member countries securities/stock exchanges over the period 2012–2023. FFR was measured using the F-SCORE model (Dechow et al., 2011). This study used the logistic regression to test the hypotheses. In addition, the ordinary least square, the generalized method of moments and an alternative measure of FFR, the modified Jones discretional accruals model (Dechow et al., 1995), were used to validate the baseline results. Findings: This study found that AC gender diversity and financial expertise had a negative effect on FFR. However, AC size and frequency of meeting had a positive effect. Finally, the results revealed that firm size moderated the relationship between AC characteristics and FFR. Research limitations/implications: This study found that AC gender diversity and financial expertise had a negative effect on FFR. However, AC size and frequency of meeting had a positive effect. Finally, the results revealed that firm size moderated the relationship between AC characteristics and FFR. Practical implications: The findings of this study not only extend the extant empirical literature on AC and FFR in developing countries but also help corporate owner, board chairs and policymakers in making more informed decisions. For instance, policymakers may device corporate governance codes in light of firm attributes such as size. In addition, these results may be useful to equity owners in structuring their AC. Originality/value: This study contributes to the growing literature on AC and FFR in several folds. First, it examines the relationship between AC characteristics and FFR from a developing region, the EAC. Second, it extends the literature by assessing whether firm size moderates the link between AC characteristics and FFR.Keywords
This publication has 134 references indexed in Scilit:
- Internal Control, Financial Oversight and Risk Management2023
- How pervasive is corporate fraud?Review of Accounting Studies, 2023
- Gender diversity in boardroom and its impact on firm performanceJournal of Management and Governance, 2021
- Environmental, social and governance performance and stock price volatility: A moderating role of firm sizeJournal of Public Affairs, 2020
- Audit committee diversity and financial restatementsJournal of Management and Governance, 2020
- The Relationship Between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm’s Performance2020
- Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: a panel data analysisJournal of Management and Governance, 2016
- Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging marketsStrategic Management Journal, 2014
- Does Industry Regulation Matter? New Evidence on Audit Committees and Earnings ManagementJournal of Business Ethics, 2014
- Reining in excessive risk-taking by executives: the effect of accountabilityTheory and Decision, 2012