Next Generation Biodegradable Ureteral Stent in a Yucatan Pig Model
- 1 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 183 (2) , 765-771
Abstract
Ureteral stents are commonly used to facilitate kidney drainage but they may produce significant stent symptoms and morbidity, and require a secondary procedure for removal. Previous biodegradable stents showed bio-incompatibility or inconsistent degradation, requiring extra procedures to remove undegraded stent fragments. We previously reported a first generation biodegradable stent composed of suture-like material that required placement through the lumen of a sheath and degraded by 10 weeks. We now report second and third generation biodegradable stents that degrade more rapidly and can be placed directly over a polytetrafluoroethylene guidewire. Two groups of 16 Yucatan pigs each were unilaterally stented endoscopically with a control nondegradable (biostable) stent or a second generation degradable Uriprene stent. Blood studies, renal ultrasound and excretory urography were done throughout the study to determine renal function, hydronephrosis and stent degradation. Genitourinary organs were harvested at necropsy for pathological analysis. A third generation stent designed to improve degradation time was bilaterally implanted endoscopically into 4 Yorkshire Farm pigs (total of 8 stents), followed by excretory urography weekly to assess degradation and kidney function. Biomaterial parameters were tested. Second generation stents began degrading at 2 weeks and were completely degraded by 10 weeks. All third generation stents were degraded by 4 weeks. Hydronephrosis was considerably less in the Uriprene group than in control biostable stented kidneys. Biostable stented ureters showed an average higher degree of inflammation, uropathy and nephropathy. Physical characteristics indicate that Uriprene stents are significantly more resistant to stent compression and have markedly higher tensile strength and coil strength comparable to that of other commercially available plastic stents. Our study confirms that Uriprene stents are biocompatible and provide good renal drainage. They hold promise for decreasing the need for a secondary procedure and stent related morbidity, such as infection and irritative symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigation of a Novel Degradable Ureteral Stent in a Porcine ModelJournal of Urology, 2008
- Ureteral stents: Coil strength and durometerUrology, 2006
- In vitro evaluation of ureteral stent compressionUrology, 2006
- Can the Complicated Forgotten Indwelling Ureteric Stents be Lethal?International Urology and Nephrology, 2005
- Febrile Complications Following Insertion of 100 Double-J Ureteral StentsJournal of Endourology, 2005
- Characteristics of bacterial colonization and urinary tract infection after indwelling of double-J ureteral stentUrology, 2003
- Use of a Temporary Ureteral Drainage Stent After Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy: Results From a Phase II Clinical TrialJournal of Urology, 2003
- Phase I Trial of a Temporary Ureteral Drainage StentJournal of Endourology, 2003
- Indwelling Ureteral Stents: Evaluation of Symptoms, Quality of Life and UtilityJournal of Urology, 2003
- Evaluation of the Use of a Biodegradable Ureteral Stent After Retrograde Endopyelotomy in a Porcine ModelJournal of Urology, 2002