A quantum mechanical analysis of time and motion in relativity theory
Open Access
- 20 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by EHU Press in THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
- Vol. 39 (2) , 165-191
Abstract
An operational approach to quantum mechanics has been developed in the past decades in our group in Brussels. A similar approach is taken in this work, making use of the extra operational depth offered by this approach, to show that the construction of spacetime is specific to each observer. What is usually referred to as the block universe then emerges by noting that parts of the past and future are also contained in the present, but without the limitations that a four-dimensional block universe usually implies, of a reality in which change would be impossible. In our operational approach, reality remains dynamic, with free choice playing a central role in its conceptualization. We also show that, when operationally analyzed, the theory implies that objects move not only in space, but also and especially in time, and more generally in spacetime, with their rest mass being a measure of their kinetic time energy. We therefore claim that Einstein’s relativity revolution has not been fully realized, since most physicists are not ready to accept these consequences of the theory although the formula’s showing them, when operationally analyzed, are in every relativity textbook. In particular, when relativistic motion is revisited as a genuine four-dimensional motion, it becomes possible to reinterpret the parameter c associated with the coordinate speed of light, which becomes the magnitude of the four-velocity of all material entities. We observe that this four-dimensional motion in Minkowski space can also be better understood if placed in the broader perspective of quantum mechanics, provided that non-locality is interpreted as non-spatiality, thus indicating the existence of an underlying non-spatial reality, the nature of which could be conceptual, consistent with the conceptuality interpretation of quantum mechanics. This hypothesis is reinforced by noting that when observers, or experiencers, as they will be referred to in this article, are described by acknowledging their cognitive nature of entities moving in a semantic space, Minkowski metric emerges in a natural way.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Nature of Time in Relativistic Operational RealityTiming & Time Perception, 2024
- Rethinking SuperdeterminismFrontiers in Physics, 2020
- On the Conceptuality Interpretation of Quantum and Relativity TheoriesFoundations of Science, 2018
- The Possibilist Transactional Interpretation and RelativityFoundations of Physics, 2012
- Quantum phenomena explored with neutronsNew Journal of Physics, 2011
- Bell's theorem does not eliminate fully causal hidden variablesInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1988
- Description of many separated physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanicsFoundations of Physics, 1982
- On the Foundations of Quantum Physics1976
- Über die Transformation der Raumzeitkoordinaten von ruhenden auf bewegte SystemeAnnalen der Physik, 1911
- Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im NormalspectrumAnnalen der Physik, 1901