Effect of phosphorus addition on biofiltration pre-treatment to reduce ultrafiltration membrane fouling
Open Access
- 17 February 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Desalination and Water Treatment
- Vol. 57 (52) , 25057-25069
Abstract
A pilot-scale study investigated the effect of phosphorus addition on a drinking water biofilter used to reduce fouling of an ultrafiltration membrane. Biofiltration without pre-treatment (BFwp) has been shown to be an effective pre-treatment for the removal of natural organic matter (NOM) components that cause membrane fouling. However, the river source used in this study was found to have low phosphorus concentrations that could potentially affect biofilter biomass levels and NOM biodegradation. The river water source (Saugeen River located at Walkerton, Ontario, Canada) had a high total organic carbon (4.34–6.61 mg/L) of primarily humic content, variable turbidity, and seasonal changes in water temperature (9.7–19.9°C) as measured over the study period. Phosphorus was added to the biofilter influent at 0.01 mg P/L, and later at 0.05 mg P/L, over a four-month period. Biofilter activity, NOM removal, and membrane performance were compared to a control system operating under identical conditions but without nutrient addition. Filter biomass measured by ATP and fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis (overall enzyme activity) was stable over time, with no difference between control and phosphorus-amended biofilters. As well, phosphorus addition did not improve the removal of NOM fractions, especially biopolymers that are important for membrane fouling. There was a small initial increase in the removal of dissolved organic carbon and humic substances after phosphorus addition, but this effect diminished over time. The effluent from each biofilter was used to operate an ultrafiltration membrane system using conditions similar to full scale. Membrane fouling for each experiment was measured over 1.5 d, and operating cycles included 30-min permeation followed by backwashing/air sparging. Results showed that there was no difference in hydraulically reversible or irreversible fouling of membranes fed with the effluent from control or phosphorus-amended biofilters. It was found that biofilter nutrient feed requirements are likely site specific, and affected by factors including biomass and NOM characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of hydraulically reversible and hydraulically irreversible fouling on the removal of MS2 and φX174 bacteriophage by an ultrafiltration membraneWater Research, 2014
- Microfiltration of different surface waters with/without coagulation: Clear correlations between membrane fouling and hydrophilic biopolymersWater Research, 2014
- Fouling of low-pressure membranes during drinking water treatment: effect of NOM components and biofiltration pretreatmentWater Supply, 2013
- Correlations of relevant membrane foulants with UF membrane fouling in different watersWater Research, 2013
- The elemental stoichiometry of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and its relationships with organismic lifestyle and ecosystem structure and function: a review and perspectivesBiogeochemistry, 2011
- The biofilm matrixNature Reviews Microbiology, 2010
- Assessing the Performance of Biological Filtration As Pretreatment to Low Pressure Membranes for Drinking WaterEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2009
- Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranesDesalination, 2008
- Scale‐dependent carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus seston stoichiometry in marine and freshwatersLimnology and Oceanography, 2008
- Investigation of microbially available phosphorus (MAP) in flemish drinking waterWater Research, 2005