Cone Beam Computerized Tomographic Analysis of Collum Angle of the Maxillary Central Incisors in Different Types of Malocclusion: Comparative Assessment in Saudi, Jordan and Egypt Subpopulation
Authors:
- Rakhi IssraniRIRakhi Issrani
- Namdeo PrabhuNPNamdeo Prabhu
- Sunitha SiddannaSSSunitha Siddanna
- Sarah Hatab AlanaziSASarah Hatab Alanazi
- Mohammad Khursheed AlamMohammad Khursheed Alam
- Manay Srinivas MunisekharMMManay Srinivas Munisekhar
- May Othman HamzaMHMay Othman Hamza
- Reham Fawzi Dawood ShabanahRSReham Fawzi Dawood Shabanah
- Rasha Saleh Ali GadhRGRasha Saleh Ali Gadh
Open Access
- 20 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 12 (6) , 1506
Abstract
Background: The collum angle (CA) is an extremely significant for patients who are undergoing orthodontic, dental implant restoration, prosthodontic and periodontic treatments. Aim and Objectives: To determine and compare the mean CA for maxillary central incisor in different types of malocclusion utilizing 3D Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT) images. The additional objectives were to determine and compare the mean CA for maxillary central incisor based upon the demographic characteristics among Saudi, Jordan and Egypt subpopulation and to test for significant differences in the CA of maxillary central incisor with different molar malocclusions. Methodology: A total of 400 CBCT images were included from the radiology archive at the College of Dentistry, Jouf University (Sakaka, Saudi Arabia). The CBCT images were divided into four groups based upon molar classifications. The selected records were used for the measurement of CA of maxillary central incisor using the measurement tool built into 3D:OnDemand software. Statistical analysis was done using independent t test and ANOVA to examine the differences between gender and races. Results: The mean CA for Class II div 2 exhibited significantly higher crown-root variation as compared other groups (p < 0.0001). Males sample showed greater value of CA for each group as compared to the females and this difference was statistically significant for all the groups other than for Class I (p < 0.05). The post hoc pairwise comparisons between the races showed statistically insignificant findings (p > 0.05). Significant difference was found on pairwise comparisons among different malocclusion groups other than for group Class I/Class II div 1 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The CA of Class II div 2 group was the greatest as compared to other malocclusion groups. Males sample showed greater value of CA for each group as compared to the females and this difference was statistically significant for all the groups other than for Class I. Statistically insignificant difference was noted for the mean CA among different races whereas significant difference was found on pairwise comparisons among different malocclusion groups other than for group Class I/Class II div 1.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- [A cone-beam computed tomography study on crown-root morphology of maxillary anterior teeth in Class II, division 2 malocclusion].2016
- Effects of crown-root angle on stress distribution in the maxillary central incisors’ PDL during application of intrusive and retraction forces: a three-dimensional finite element analysisProgress in Orthodontics, 2013
- Relationship between crown-root angulation (collum angle) of maxillary central incisors in Class II, division 2 malocclusion and lower lip lineOrthodontics The Art and Practice of Dentofacial Enhancement, 2013
- The Collum angle of the maxillary central incisors in patients with different types of malocclusionJournal of Dental Sciences, 2012
- The Future of Orthodontic Diagnostic RecordsSeminars in Orthodontics, 2011
- Maxillary incisor crown-root relationships in different Angle malocclusionsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1993
- Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisorAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1984
- The Crown to Root Angle of Maxillary Central Incisors in Different Incisal ClassesBritish Journal of Orthodontics, 1983
- The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurementsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1983
- Variation in morphology of the maxillary central incisors found in Class II, Division 2 malocclusionsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1980