Uncritical but Overconfident? How Learners Engage with AI-Generated Images of Scientists
- 27 June 2026
- book chapter
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 450-458
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives on AI literacy in Middle School Classrooms: An Integrative ReviewPostdigital Science and Education, 2025
- AI advocates and cautious critics: How AI attitudes, AI interest, use of AI, and AI literacy build university students' AI self-efficacyComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2024
- Gender bias in generative artificial intelligence text-to-image depiction of medical studentsHealth Education Journal, 2024
- Influence of believed AI involvement on the perception of digital medical adviceNature Medicine, 2024
- The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic reviewSmart Learning Environments, 2024
- The invisible women: uncovering gender bias in AI-generated images of professionalsFeminist Media Studies, 2023
- What do university students know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy testComputers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2023
- Exploring the state of science stereotypes: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the Draw‐A‐Scientist ChecklistSchool Science and Mathematics, 2020
- The Role of Prototype Matching in Science Pursuits: Perceptions of Scientists That Are Inaccurate and Diverge From Self-Perceptions Predict Reduced Interest in a Science CareerPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2018
- Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1999