Impact of apical foreshortening on deformation measurements: a report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task Force
Authors:
- Luigi P BadanoLBLuigi P Badano
- Jens-Uwe VoigtJVJens-Uwe Voigt
- Eacvi-Ase Industry Standardization Task ForceEFEacvi-Ase Industry Standardization Task Force
- Jamie HamiltonJHJamie Hamilton
- 30 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vol. 21 (3) , 337-343
Abstract
Aims: Foreshortening of apical views is a common problem in echocardiography. It results in an abnormally thick false apex and a shortened left ventricular (LV) long axis. We sought to evaluate the impact of foreshortened (FS) on LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and layer-specific 2D speckle tracking based segmental (S) and global (G) longitudinal strain (LS) measurements. Methods and results: We examined 72 participants using a GE Vivid E9 system. FS apical views were collected from an imaging window one rib-space higher than the optimal images. Ejection fraction as well as layer-specific GLS and SLS measurements were analysed by GE EchoPAC v201 and TomTec Image Arena 4.6 and compared between optimal and FS images. On average, LV long axis was 10% shorter in FS images than in optimal images. FS induced a relative change in LVEF of 3.3% and 6.9% for GE and TomTec, respectively (both, P < 0.001). Endocardial GLS was 9.0% higher with GE and 23.2% with TomTec (P < 0.001). Midwall GLS measurements were less affected (7.8% for GE and 14.1% for TomTec, respectively, both P < 0.001). Segmental strain analysis revealed that the mid-ventricular and apical segments were more affected by foreshortening, and endocardial measurements were more affected than midwall. Conclusion: Optimal image geometry is crucial for accurate LV function assessment. Foreshorhening of apical views has a substantial impact on longitudinal strain measurements, predominantly in the apex and in the endocardial layer. Our data suggest that measuring midwall strain might therefore be the more robust approach for clinical routine use.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
- Research Foundation Flanders
- University of Leuven
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Layer-Specific Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements Among Five Different Vendors: A Report from the EACVI-ASE Strain Standardization Task ForceJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2018
- Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular ImagingEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017
- Head-to-Head Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain Measurements among Nine Different VendorsJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2015
- Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular ImagingEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2015
- Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imagingEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014
- The Impact of Foreshortening on Regional Strain - A Comparison of Regional Strain Evaluation Between Speckle Tracking and Tissue Velocity ImagingUltraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, 2013
- Does Two‐Dimensional Image Reconstruction from Three‐Dimensional Full Volume Echocardiography Improve the Assessment of Left Ventricular Morphology and Function?Echocardiography, 2012
- Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRIEuropean Heart Journal, 2009
- Advanced speckle tracking echocardiography allowing a three-myocardial layer-specific analysis of deformation parametersEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008
- Three-Dimensional EchocardiographyJACC, 2006