Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance
Authors:
- 27 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
- Vol. 22 (12) , 1006-1013
Abstract
Objectives Systemic issues can adversely affect the diagnostic process. Many system-related barriers can be masked by ‘resilient’ actions of frontline providers (ie, actions supporting the safe delivery of care in the presence of pressures that the system cannot readily adapt to). We explored system barriers and resilient actions of primary care providers (PCPs) in the diagnostic evaluation of cancer. Methods We conducted a secondary data analysis of interviews of PCPs involved in diagnostic evaluation of 29 lung and colorectal cancer cases. Cases covered a range of diagnostic timeliness and were analysed to identify barriers for rapid diagnostic evaluation, and PCPs’ actions involving elements of resilience addressing those barriers. We rated these actions according to whether they were usual or extraordinary for typical PCP work. Results Resilient actions and associated barriers were found in 59% of the cases, in all ranges of timeliness, with 40% involving actions rated as beyond typical. Most of the barriers were related to access to specialty services and coordination with patients. Many of the resilient actions involved using additional communication channels to solicit cooperation from other participants in the diagnostic process. Discussion Diagnostic evaluation of cancer involves several resilient actions by PCPs targeted at system deficiencies. PCPs’ actions can sometimes mitigate system barriers to diagnosis, and thereby impact the sensitivity of ‘downstream’ measures (eg, delays) in detecting barriers. While resilient actions might enable providers to mitigate system deficiencies in the short run, they can be resource intensive and potentially unsustainable. They complement, rather than substitute for, structural remedies to improve system performance. Measures to detect and fix system performance issues targeted by these resilient actions could facilitate diagnostic safety.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The science of human factors: separating fact from fictionBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Balance Among US Physicians Relative to the General US PopulationArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2012
- Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary careBMJ Quality & Safety, 2011
- Follow-up Actions on Electronic Referral Communication in a Multispecialty Outpatient SettingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Toward Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: Addressing the Interfaces of Primary and Oncology-Related Subspecialty CareJNCI Monographs, 2010
- Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategiesAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2009
- Missed Opportunities to Initiate Endoscopic Evaluation for Colorectal Cancer DiagnosisAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2009
- Coordinating Care — A Perilous Journey through the Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS modelQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- The Quality of CareJAMA, 1988